If you have an issue with the use of the word “science”, fair enough. I can also understand why you might. I also should have clarified that what I meant by “science of hadith” is specific to Shia Islam and doesn't exist so much in Sunni Islam. It's a very rigorous system of evaluation of historical sources. There are Shia jurisprudents who specialise only in hadith. I meant it scientific in the sense of its rigour. Whether or not you accept that is up to you. That's also not the point. Everybody takes whatever is written on this forum in their own way. But if you have an issue with what I or anyone else says, it's only decency and good manners to bring it up in a proper way and not just as an excuse to insult. You even refer to me in the third person as "the propagandist". What's the deal with that?