• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Honorific Societies, good or ill?

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,568
I'm watching The Last Samuari, a film that on some levels I despise as almost tantamount to racist (why the inclusion of a white, american cavalry man was so, so necessary to tell this story and just how he was valorised as the last samuari I felt was insulting to culture and context and tale it was meant to be paying homage to), on the other hand I love the portrayals of honorific social interaction, convention and highly codified manners of respect, deference and calm resolution are highly, highly appealing to me.

I remember becoming interested in martial arts at an early age and it was as much to do with the honour codes and respectful behaviourial expectations as anything else.

Although, on the few occasions that I've tried to discuss this with anyone, without first highly qualifying or contextualising it with reference to the Asiatic or Martial examples people are generally outraged, surprised, disgusted.

The reason being that they associate honorific codes with patriarchy, oppressive familial authority and expectations, so called "honour" killings, sometimes of people who have already been victimised, raped, abused, humiliated.

What is anyone else's thinking on this? What do these terms and ideas immediately bring to mind and is it good or bad?
 
Top