User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    336

    Default Acquiring a database versus creation of understanding

    Acquiring a database versus creation of understanding

    The success of our production and consumption society is structured upon our highly rationalized capacity to develop, organize and utilize knowledge designed to encourage individuals to become highly specialized experts in narrow specialties. Our industrial base demands experts who require little understanding except in very narrow specialties.

    Most parents desire that their children graduate from higher education with a credential entitling them to a good job with a high salary. The student of higher education in the United States graduates with a large database of specialized knowledge designed to permit that graduate to immediately fit into a large organization of specialized professionals.

    Our Colleges and Universities have successfully met the demands of society and are the envy of the world. Higher education has learned to produce graduates with a large database of highly specialized knowledge.

    Unfortunately the intrinsic value of education has been lost as a result. We have facilitated the maximization of production and consumption at the cost of losing contact with the original value of education.

    I do not think that efficient assimilation of information into knowledge is our problem; I think our problem is creating meaning from what we do know.

    It appears to me that humans have a great propensity to acquire knowledge but a miniscule capacity for understanding the meaning of that acquired knowledge. I would liken the basic human cognitive nature to be similar to that displayed by the United States Intelligence Agency in the 9/11 fiasco. We had the dots but did not have the capacity to connect the dots. Our educational system displays a vast capacity to graduate individuals with extensive databases but little understanding.

    I would say that the intrinsic value of education is wisdom. I would define wisdom as a sensitive synthesis of broad knowledge, deep understanding and solid judgment. Our universities produce individuals capable of developing a great technology but lacking the wisdom to manage the world modified by that technology. Higher education has become a commodity.

    The relationship of sex to love as compared with the relationship of knowledge to understanding might help to clarify my point.

    Sex and knowledge are easily acquired and easily forgotten. Love and understanding requires an intense investment of the person. Sex can alienate, thus making love more problematic; just as extensive specialized knowledge, which leads to intellectual arrogance, can alienate, thus making understanding problematic. One can get sex but one must create love. Love and understanding are something to seek and work for and may or may not happen. Carl Sagan is quoted as having written; “Understanding is a kind of ecstasy.”

    When we speak of a cornucopia of information and our attempt to assimilate that info in a coherent manner so as to facilitate our survival I wonder if we might not be missing something important. Our DNA was developed over millions of years based upon the prevailing environment. We have, as a result of our very successful rationalization of knowledge acquisition developed a far different universe than what our genes have prepared us for.

    All of our fundamental capabilities make it possible for us to assimilate and organize great deals of information and to react to that knowledge in ways to assure survival in the world of the past. However, what do we do in this very different world of technology?

    Conversion of input stimuli into knowledge was sufficient before but perhaps our future success in the world indicates that we may have to seriously modify our response to the world. Up to this point we have been able to successfully navigate a world where knowledge with little understanding is sufficient. Perhaps such a situation is reaching a climax. Perhaps we must adjust to becoming much more adept at understanding.

    The success of our production and consumption society is structured upon our highly rationalized capacity to develop, organize and utilize knowledge; this process is designed to encourage individuals to become highly specialized experts in narrow specialties. Our industrial base demands experts who require little understanding except in very narrow specialties.

  2. #2
    Senor Membrane
    Join Date
    May 2008
    MBTI
    INFP
    Posts
    3,190

    Default

    There can't be wisdom without a highly developed and mature individual. The western societies give no credit for developing yourself (it's not effective), and the people in leading positions have so tight schedule throughout their lives that it is impossible for them to have time to search for meaning.

    It's sad. The world will come to a dead end soon. Not maybe the dead end, it might just be a huge turning point. Hopefully.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Drezoryx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    MBTI
    ENTp
    Posts
    213

    Default

    your observations like always have merit but one need not take a pessimistic stance on society so often

    generalist vs specialist debate has been going on for a while. those who get fedup with specialising too narrowly move into management via mba or move into ngos there are a few avenues.

    if im not wrong a specialist who wants to understand more can always move into research

    what you make of yourself is in ones own hands to some extent.
    Last edited by Drezoryx; 11-13-2009 at 01:40 PM.
    Type 8 sx/sp/so
    O:C:E:A:N :: 65:69:59:57:9

  4. #4

    Default

    When there is too much input to handle, we make data.
    When there is too much data to handle, we make statistics.
    When there are too many statistics to handle, we create models.
    When there are too many models to handle, we create knowledge.

    When there is too much knowledge to handle, it only makes sense to create understanding.

    ...and when there is too much to understand, we need wisdom.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    STP
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Acquiring a database allows us to blame others, where as gaining an understanding puts you as a person at fault. When you have an understanding you make judgements based on your knowledge. When you acquire a databse your judgements are based on others knowledge.

    "dude, thats what google said"

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    9
    Posts
    6

    Default

    You should read some nineteenth century philosophy and research ideological constructs.
    Heck you can even go back to Plato's Republic. You will find the themes and questions you raise are age old. It might also help you in refining and sorting out the relationships between some of your concepts a bit better. That said, good on you for trying to get your head around and express big thoughts.

Similar Threads

  1. [Other] the creation of The Greatest Member
    By BlackDog in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 01-14-2014, 03:11 PM
  2. Relgion: link between two creations of a different religion?
    By EEW in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-03-2013, 04:34 AM
  3. Unconscious Tendencies vs. A Method of Understanding People
    By highlander in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 02-08-2013, 06:36 PM
  4. Macrocosm: from adaptation to, to creation of?
    By coberst in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-11-2009, 02:41 PM
  5. To understand the object of study is to leave it
    By wildcat in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-23-2007, 03:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO