But I still disagre with your position.
Lately this kind of arguments are more and more poplular but I think that entire thing doesn't work.
As for argument about intellgent people and accepting new ideas.
Intelligence does not metter here that much key part is education.
When it comes to science, you need to learn something so that you are able to learn something else. Which you will then use to learn something new. Once you know that you can expand even more.
Because of this genaral public can't fully understand what science says because of information that is needed to understand information which is needed to understand ..............................................
There is no way you can understand it unless you actually become a scientist and even then you will understand only tiny part of knowledge.
So I will create an argument and I know what I am going to say. It is just that I need time to type and make some parts more understandable.
Idea of God is very complex one and it is hard to move it from status quo. Everything that is against it is complex, abstract(some pars more some parts less), there is plenty of counterintuitive ideas and ......
I will try to do my best so show this spectre of ideas(that god does not exist) in more simple form and point on details that are hidden.
But simplification could take it's tool.
Then you can say that you agree or disagree with me.