Quote Originally Posted by ezfzx View Post
I'm trying to support or refute validation of that instrument ... do you have some sources I can look up that explain why it sucks?
The principle that it is the cognitive functions themselves that make up the acronym for your type, not the reverse. Its lazy to say that "I'm an E" or "You're an F". The more complete way to do it is to say "I'm a Te dom" etc. Do you see what I'm getting at? Its like jogging across the street so the light doesn't change on you, but then you walk half-way to your destination.