User Tag List

First 23456 Last

Results 31 to 40 of 59

  1. #31
    To here knows when... Odi et Amo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Your Empathizing Quotient is 58. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an above average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately. You know how to treat people with care and sensitivity".

    Your Systemizing Quotient is 36. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an average ability for analysing and exploring a system".
    Solitude
    Comes just as it goes
    Goes as just its umbra
    Comes


    “Don't walk behind me; I may not lead. Don't walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my friend.”
    ― Albert Camus

    4w5/5w4/1w2, Neutral Good, RlxAI

  2. #32
    Senior Member Forever_Jung's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Enneagram
    6
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Your Empathizing Quotient is 54. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an above average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately. You know how to treat people with care and sensitivity".

    Your Systemizing Quotient is 6. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have a lower than average ability for analysing and exploring a system".




  3. #33
    Member JustAMind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    MBTI
    ?
    Enneagram
    ?
    Socionics
    ?
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Such Irony View Post
    Your Empathizing Quotient is 30. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have a lower than average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately".

    Your Systemizing Quotient is 31. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have a lower than average ability for analysing and exploring a system".

    What? The systemizing should be way higher. I'm good at analyzing and exploring systems of interest to me. I guess the systems asked about on this inventory didn't interest me as much but that doesn't mean I lack ability.
    Interesting, I feel I should have greater emphaty. I think I can sense feelings better than average, but sometimes I don't care and do my thing anyway

    Your Empathizing Quotient is 37. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately. You know how to treat people with care and sensitivity".

    Your Systemizing Quotient is 36. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an average ability for analysing and exploring a system".

  4. #34
    Member Senkrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    MBTI
    FiTe
    Enneagram
    YwX sx/sp
    Posts
    66

    Default

    The last time I took this test I got 26 in SQ and 0 in EQ. I don't even understand how I got a 0. Sure, people are weird but I am not an idiot.
    I'm a green bean killing machine.

  5. #35
    failed poetry slam career chubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5w4 sp/sx
    Socionics
    ILI Te
    Posts
    4,223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Senkrad View Post
    The last time I took this test I got 26 in SQ and 0 in EQ. I don't even understand how I got a 0. Sure, people are weird but I am not an idiot.
    What about your avatar?

    I suppose this test is about your preference and not really what you are capable of.

  6. #36
    Member Senkrad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    MBTI
    FiTe
    Enneagram
    YwX sx/sp
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chubber View Post
    What about your avatar?

    I suppose this test is about your preference and not really what you are capable of.
    Oh, that is just to keep the little kids away. And some easily spooked adults aswell.

    This test is really about preferences, what kinds of things are important for you or not. I don't understand how people can buy things without knowing what the thing is capable of doing, yet people do just that. It is not that I don't notice other peoples feelings, for me it is just not always as important to always care about feelings as it is to do the right thing.
    And I also think that the questionare that I filled out was coded wrong, haha. I think you could actually get a negative score on EQ... sounds healthy enough for me.
    I'm a green bean killing machine.

  7. #37
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    14,019

    Default Empathizing-Systematizing Test

    I'm about to take this 120-question test.
    Empathizing is considered "female" and systematizing is considered "male" according to Baron-Cohen's theory.

    Empathizing-Systemizing Test
    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

  8. #38
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    14,019

    Default

    My result:
    Your Empathizing Quotient is 20. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have a lower than average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately".

    Your Systemizing Quotient is 33. Baron-Cohen (2003) suggests that this means "you have an average ability for analysing and exploring a system".
    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

  9. #39
    Senior Member wolfnara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    649 sp/so
    Socionics
    EII Fi
    Posts
    500

    Default

    I got this;

    I didn't read the OP...that quiz was so long! Anyway this was what i expected.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mal12345 View Post
    Empathizing is considered "female" and systematizing is considered "male" according to Baron-Cohen's theory.
    People are always pointing out the male and female differences -why? It seems to be true, but since genders are encouraged to be more logical/emotional though social constructs it is impossible to confirm if this is really true. Looking at the results of members here says otherwise I think.
    "Those who do not move, do not notice their chains"
    -Rosa Luxemburg

  10. #40
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    14,019

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfnara View Post
    I got this;

    I didn't read the OP...that quiz was so long! Anyway this was what i expected. People are always pointing out the male and female differences -why? It seems to be true, but since genders are encouraged to be more logical/emotional though social constructs it is impossible to confirm if this is really true.
    Are you sure it's a social construct?
    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

Similar Threads

  1. Moral sense - moral system testing
    By EcK in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-13-2017, 08:11 AM
  2. Test System Problem
    By highlander in forum Official Decrees
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-17-2014, 06:29 AM
  3. Empathizer or systemizer?
    By TweedleDee in forum Online Personality Tests
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-27-2011, 01:59 PM
  4. Reputation System - Test
    By Haight in forum Official Decrees
    Replies: 337
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 08:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO