Cognitive Development Survey

[Spurgeon]

EDIT: My Apologies....Apparently, the author of the test disabled the ability for it to calculate results.
I still think it has great descriptions, and the fomat makes it easy to calculate/determine the results on your own.
----------------------------------------------------
Wow!

This is the best cognitive functions survey I've seen anywhere. Check it out! :

http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/assessment/develop_old.html

As far as I can tell, there haven't been any posts about this one on TypologyCentral, but my sincere apologies if I'm wrong.

It takes approx. 10 minutes to complete.

Post your results (and your opinion of the survey as well!)

 

[Jaguar]

Apology accepted.

 

[Spurgeon]

Apology accepted.

Oh crap!

Where is it?

 

[Jaguar]

The problem is, that version of the test should be taken offline.
The author of the test disabled the ability for it to calculate results. He did that a long time ago.

 

[Qlip]

I'm watching you Spurgeon.

 

[CuriousFeeling]

Hitting submit doesn't work on that site (old link)... but here's the order (strongest to weakest), from what I came up with from the survey:

1. Ni
2. Ti
3. Fe
4. Te
5. Fi
6. Ne
7. Si
8. Se

----

edit: retook the test...
Se- 10
Si- 16
Te-25
Ti- 26
Fe- 26
Fi- 24
Ne-21
Ni- 30

Ni>Fe=Ti>Te>Fi>Ne>Si>Se

Suggests INFJ.

 

[Spurgeon]

Yikes!

I'm really poor at foruming. Maybe I should go back to lurking. LOL.

 

[Spurgeon]

I'm watching you Spurgeon.

That's funny. (Not to derail my own thread) but I've BEEN watching YOU.

 

[Qlip]

That's funny. (Not to derail my own thread) but I've BEEN watching YOU.

Staring contest. You blink first.

 

[KDude]

The problem is, that version of the test should be taken offline.
The author of the test disabled the ability for it to calculate results. He did that a long time ago.

I asked him to put it back online once. The newer test is not an improvement.

So, did he actually fix it? Can't be bothered to try atm.

 

[Spurgeon]

I asked him to put it back online once. The newer test is not an improvement.

So, did he actually fix it? Can't be bothered to try atm.

No, I just checked.

Unfortunately the "SUBMIT" button doesn't work.

The result was overwhelmingly obvious when I took it, so I didn't bother to hit the "SUBMIT" button.

Sorry for posting without making sure it worked, everyone!

I feel really dumb right now. LOL.

 

[lunalum]

This one looks pretty good (and a good resource for a more listed description anyway)... so I'll just take this by adding up the boxes anyway.

Ne 25 (awesome use)
Ti 20 (almost as awesome use)
Fi 15 (too-good for a Ti'er use)
Ni 12 (okay-ish use)
Se 11 (alright-ish use)
Fe 11 (whatever use)
Te 10 (mediocre use)
Si 8 ('you left this one behind in a train long ago' use)

 

[Such Irony]

Se: 8
Si: 15
Te: 20
Ti: 22
Fe: 13
Fi: 14
Ne: 18
Ni: 12