How Machiavellian are you? (MACH IV test)

[iamWong]

High mach. 61.

 

[SolitaryWalker]

98(upon retake)

 

[FDG]

Machiavellism is for weaklings without balls. Seriously, I hate the idea of making people do things indirectly. It just takes the pleasure out of things. I much prefer the direct approach. It might be tougher in the short term, but in the long term, I find it's the better strategy and yields the most rewards. I hate indirectness, it seems like an excuse for a lack of guts.

That's exactly my take on it too.

 

[SillySapienne]

56/100

low mach.

 

[colmena]

35

Surprised, fucktards?

 

[lastrailway]

Your Machiavelli score is: 81

"high Mach", you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

Nah, not being naive does not mean being Machiavellian.

 

[SillySapienne]

Surprised, fucktards?

I'll have you know that I find that word, (fucktard), to be highly offensive!!!

I have a cousin who happens to be a morally bereft, mentally challenged individual.

And he is not a fucktard, goddammit! He's a human being!!!

 

[colmena]

That's a jerktard.

It was a slight on your sexual prowess.

Bar the fuckvoids. They're on my team.

 

[Litvyak]

Let's revive this thread.

79, high mach.

 

[BlackCat]

65.

 

[The Outsider]

Your Machiavelli score is: 85

"high Mach", you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

 

[Asterion]

56. Mach low and lazy

 

[Phantonym]

69/100 "high Mach". Oh, there's no doubt I could do "wonderful" things if I wanted to. Meh.

 

[KDude]

50

 

[lunalum]

58/100

 

[Glycerine]

LOL I just wrote a paper on Machiavellian intelligence.

 

[One Day]

59

 

[Amalie]

57

 

[Coriolis]

73

 

[Halla74]

79 for me. That's probably fairly accurate.

In some situations it is necessary to be 100% Machiavellian.

Some people (ignorant, stubborn, treacherous, etc.) cannot be dealt with in any other than than to be completely mowed over.