None of mine are above 60, I feel like I somehow failed.
Apparently there is no particular preference you have developed, and trust, well enough that you use it all the time.
There is no winning or losing here. The scores merely reflect your thinking style(s) and their strength of preference.
I'm not surprised by the low pragmatist score (I am not flexible like that). Reading the longer descriptions and the rest though, I don't know. I relate to being drawn to argumentation (and people often think I am being confrontative rather than just blunt/ cutting straight to the conflict) and the union of opposites of the synthesist (is anything as clear as when it's in sharp relief?). But that also pulls out the similarities, and I used to often think there was an elegant "everyone logical will agree with this if we just looked longer" solution like the analyst- not so much anymore though. I am not as agreeable as the longer description of the idealist seems to espouse. As for realism? At some point the rubber hits the road. Talk is cheap.