socionics test

[Ginkgo]

In socionics both are supposed to have high Fe. In socionics INFP has Ni/Fe like INFJ in MBTI. That makes sense for it to be interchangable with ENFJ here then.

And the functions have the same meanings, correct?

 

[jixmixfix]

And the functions have the same meanings, correct?

no they don't...not all of them ...

 

[527468]

I got INTp followed by ISTp on this test. Correct result, dislike how it came to the result via the questions.

 

[Lavos]

Hello my dual.

"dual"? What is that?

 

[Lady_X]

This is your result:

ISFP(Dumas) - 275
INFP(Yesenin) - 275
ENFP(Huxley) - 270

ENTP(Don Quixote) - 225
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 215
ESFP(Napoleon) - 210
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 205
ESFJ(Hugo) - 205
ENTJ(Jack London) - 180
INTJ(Robespierre) - 175
ISTP(Gabin) - 175
INTP(Balzac) - 175
ESTP(Zhukov) - 165
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 155
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 115
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 100

i'm changing...oh no...somebody help me!!

 

[Lady_X]

Since when do you ever get ENTP?
The problem is the questions are not clear, since English is not the person's first language.
I got shifting scores after taking it again.

right...you're right...that must be what it is.

 

[wolfy]

Seems about right for me. I don't know much about INFJ in socionics.
Top three.
ISFP(Dumas) - 275
ISTP(Gabin) - 245
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 215

 

[Wonkavision]

My result:

ENFP(Huxley) - 270
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 265
ESFP(Napoleon) - 245

INFP(Yesenin) - 245
ESFJ(Hugo) - 220
ISFP(Dumas) - 200
ENTJ(Jack London) - 190
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 185
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 175
INTP(Balzac) - 175
INTJ(Robespierre) - 175
ESTP(Zhukov) - 160
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 160
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 115
ISTP(Gabin) - 100
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 80

 

[Jaguar]

right...you're right...that must be what it is.

Some of the questions were practically Chinese to me.
When I took it a second time, the score that was at the top the first time,
fell off the radar screen.

 

[Haphazard]

My results:

ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 205
INTJ(Robespierre) - 200
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 190

INTP(Balzac) - 180
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 180
ENTJ(Jack London) - 175
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 165
ISFP(Dumas) - 165
ISTP(Gabin) - 165
ESFJ(Hugo) - 155
ENFP(Huxley) - 155
ESFP(Napoleon) - 150
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 150
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 140
ESTP(Zhukov) - 130
INFP(Yesenin) - 130

However I highly doubt the reliability of this quiz because a lot of the questions seemed poorly translated.

 

[527468]

And the functions have the same meanings, correct?

Not technically. MBTI is defined more on the surface in my opinion. Which is why two INTJs in MBTI for example can seem so different on the inside, because they oppositely differ in values. I can tell who on this forum is an INTp or INTj, even if say they're all technically INTJs in MBTI. So the P/J switch for introverts is not absolute. It's almost about 55/45 on average, where some don't qualify for either.

My friend is writing some wonderful profiles of the types (a continuous project more than half way complete), and I'd like to share them all with you when he's finished, if it's okay with him. He is pretty experienced in studying socionics, much more than I am.

 

[WordGeek]

Seriously, why can't people who create such a test at least try to get the sentence structure and grammar right? We all make mistakes, but it defies the point, if people have trouble understanding what they are reading or being asked to answer.

Assuming that I understood the questions and answers correctly:

INTJ(Robespierre) - 280
INTP(Balzac) - 275
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 225

ENTP(Don Quixote) - 205
ENTJ(Jack London) - 205
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 205
INFP(Yesenin) - 200
ISFP(Dumas) - 195
ESTP(Zhukov) - 190
ISTP(Gabin) - 180
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 175
ENFP(Huxley) - 175
ESFP(Napoleon) - 170
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 160
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 150
ESFJ(Hugo) - 130

 

[The Outsider]

And the functions have the same meanings, correct?

Incorrect.

 

[The Outsider]

INFP(Yesenin) - 285
ISFP(Dumas) - 245
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 245

ENFP(Huxley) - 235
INTJ(Robespierre) - 230
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 215
INTP(Balzac) - 190
ESFJ(Hugo) - 190
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 190
ESFP(Napoleon) - 175
ISTP(Gabin) - 170
ENTJ(Jack London) - 170
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 145
ESTP(Zhukov) - 135
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 110
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 110

Interesting.

 

[Speed Gavroche]

ESFJ(Hugo) - 260
ENFP(Huxley) - 255
ESFP(Napoleon) - 245

ISFP(Dumas) - 240
ISTP(Gabin) - 225
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 220
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 210
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 190
ENTJ(Jack London) - 180
INFP(Yesenin) - 170
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 165
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 165
INTP(Balzac) - 155
ESTP(Zhukov) - 155
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 150
INTJ(Robespierre) - 135

 

[EcK]

ENTP(Don Quixote) - 295
ESTP(Zhukov) - 245
INTJ(Robespierre) - 230

ENTJ(Jack London) - 230
ISTP(Gabin) - 220
ISFP(Dumas) - 205
ENFP(Huxley) - 205
INTP(Balzac) - 190
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 180
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 180
INFP(Yesenin) - 165
ESFP(Napoleon) - 165
ESFJ(Hugo) - 160
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 145
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 120
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 105

 

[EcK]

highest score, btw

 

[VagrantFarce]

Who the hell wrote this test? I want to hit them, hard.

How are you people deciphering what these questions even mean?

 

[Thalassa]

Since when do you ever get ENTP?
The problem is the questions are not clear, since English is not the person's first language.
I got shifting scores after taking it again.

Actually that's the second socionics test that has given me ENTP, albeit it was like third place of course, so it must be a socionics thing.

I took one crazy test on here that gave me ISFJ and INTP, as well as INFP and INFJ. WEIRDEST freakin' test I ever took, even though after doing a few math problems the author of the test and I came to the conclusion that the test was telling me that I am actually an INFP...okay....

But then again I read a thread ISFJ/INFJ today describing this girl, and people kept saying she sounded like an ISFJ, and I thought "that's weird - I actually have a lot in common with her except for the fact that I read more and don't go to church as often."

 

[BlackCat]

Who the hell wrote this test? I want to hit them, hard.

How are you people deciphering what these questions even mean?

I had to skip two of them because I didn't understand what they were asking, no issues otherwise. The author is obviously bad with english.