User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 11 to 20 of 48

  1. #11
    Shaman BlackCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    9w8 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    7,004

    Default

    NT- 1.0
    NF- 0.925
    ST-0.65
    SF- 0.475
    () 9w8-3w4-7w6 tritype.

    sCueI (primary Inquisition)

  2. #12
    Senior Member dotdalidot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    MBTI
    UFO
    Posts
    100

    Default

    SF .37
    ST .18
    NT .38
    NF 1.0

  3. #13
    Senior Member professor goodstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7~7
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,785

    Default

    sf .285
    st .428
    nt .936
    nf 1.0
    everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?

  4. #14
    mod love baby... Lady_X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    9w1 sx/so
    Posts
    18,086

    Default

    wow i hated that test...those were impossible questions!
    There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first.
    -Jim Morrison

  5. #15
    now! in shell form INA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    intp
    Posts
    3,198

    Default

    SF 0.092
    ST 0.444
    NT 1.0
    NF 0.796
    hoarding time and space
    A single event can awaken within us a stranger totally unknown to us. To live is to be slowly born.
    — Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  6. #16
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default



    NF = 1.000
    NT = 0.809
    ST = 0.642
    SF = 0.547

  7. #17
    Senior Member laughingebony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    236

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    ^The reason the results are "odd" is the test is odd.
    IMO, you don't place THINK and IMAGINE at opposite poles.
    That's like placing N and T at opposite poles.
    So now, a bunch of solid NTs will become close to NFs or even solid NFs on that test.
    The test isn't measuring each of the four dichotomies; with each question, it's measuring the preference of one temperament over another (although I'm not sure why they split the Ss on the T/F domain instead of the J/P). Whether this holds any merit or not, I can't say. It wasn't too far off for me.

    SF 0.276
    ST 0.307
    NT 0.830
    NF 1.0

    Quote Originally Posted by bluebell (below me)
    wtf @ the number of significant figures.
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed.

  8. #18
    Senior Member bluebell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    1,478

    Default

    SF = 0.076
    ST = 0.4
    NT = 1.0
    NF = 0.923


    wtf @ the number of significant figures. Other than that, not too bad re accuracy.
    ...so much smoke pouring out of each chromosome.

  9. #19
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by laughingebony View Post
    The test isn't measuring each of the four dichotomies; with each question, it's measuring the preference of one temperament over another
    I will say it again, you don't place "think" and "imagine" opposite each other in a forced-choice format test.
    It's not that difficult to understand why.
    Per the instructions, if you choose one strongly, it means you rarely do the other.
    According to their line of thinking, a person can't both think and imagine.

    Ridiculous.

  10. #20
    your resident asshole
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,410

    Default

    SF 0.682
    ST 1.0
    NT 0.512
    NF 0.756

Similar Threads

  1. Explain the cognitive functions to me
    By Colors in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 10:40 PM
  2. A simpler way to look at the cognitive functions
    By BlackCat in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-21-2012, 03:48 PM
  3. [INTJ] Any INTJs match with the SLE profile?
    By 527468 in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-27-2009, 03:41 AM
  4. New theory of mine on the cognitive functions
    By BlackCat in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 11:58 PM
  5. Images of the Cognitive Functions
    By Mort Belfry in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-21-2008, 07:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO