User Tag List

First 2345614 Last

Results 31 to 40 of 176

  1. #31
    @.~*virinaĉo*~.@ Totenkindly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    FREE
    Enneagram
    594 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    42,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flak View Post
    It's the least I can do. Polite deference to sub-standard ideas is an abhorrent policy.
    So is not knowing when to go with the flow, once everyone already knows your opinion over and over.

    (But, of course, you'll come up with yet another snappy reply to show why your preferences should dominate any group dynamic.)

    *shrug*
    "Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

    “Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

  2. #32
    Senior Member NewEra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    I
    Posts
    3,104

    Default

    I was a little off earlier.

    Here are my updated results (based on the Cognitive Process test):


  3. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    type
    Posts
    9,100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jennifer View Post
    (But, of course, you'll come up with yet another snappy reply to show why your preferences should dominate any group dynamic.)
    Yes, I will, and thank you for providing me another chance to discredit lemons...
    So is not knowing when to go with the flow, once everyone already knows your opinion over and over.
    My deductions are consistent, while lemons' run the entire gamut of mediocre sputum. There's something new every week which needs shooting down, and quite frankly it would be absurd to assume everyone knows my opinion already in such a vast, dynamic environment as the world wide web.

  4. #34
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    lawldragons

    _.-~*`beyondaurora`*~-._.-~*`ISFJ`*~-._

  5. #35
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    _.-~*`Whatever`*~-._.-~*`ENTP`*~-._

  6. #36
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    _.-~*`Randomnity`*~-._.-~*`INTP`*~-._

  7. #37
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    _.-~*`Costrin's Friend`*~-._.-~*`ISTP`*~-._

  8. #38
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evan View Post
    I'm wondering what your program would say for
    Ti tie Ni
    Fe tie Se
    Te tie Ne
    Fi tie Si

    couldn't pick between INFJ and ISTP right?
    No actually my program is advanced enough to give the result INTX!

  9. #39
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    _.-~*`Negative`*~-._.-~*`INTP`*~-._

  10. #40
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flak View Post
    The point is that he's "admitted" to being several types, at one time or another. I've been following this lemons character from the beginning, and I'm quite unimpressed, quite.
    Haha. You are making assumptions over the internet about a person you know so little about. You're basing my character on a fantasy. Aren't you familiar with that called a lie? They do also exist on the internet... and they are plentiful in psychology if you haven't noticed. My doorstep is just down the street. In any case you're stalking a guy.

    Secondly, you are misconstrued again without realizing it. Socionics isn't the same as MBTI.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flak View Post
    My deductions are consistent, while lemons' run the entire gamut of mediocre sputum.
    If my deductions are mediocre, then your one so-called original theory is putz poo on my shoe. I've never seen anything so stupid taken wholeheartedly. The funny thing is that you believe your self-satisfying correctitude to be novel, yet your incapability of invention is so evident. Basically you suck at criticizing because you have no worth. That is why no one takes you seriously when you say these things.

Similar Threads

  1. How do you and your type dress?
    By CzeCze in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 11:53 PM
  2. Do you like people of your type?
    By Azseroffs in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 10:48 AM
  3. So, are you really your type, or do you wish you were your type???
    By SillySapienne in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 10:46 AM
  4. How Do You Differ From Your Type?
    By RansomedbyFire in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 08:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO