User Tag List

First 715161718 Last

Results 161 to 170 of 176

  1. #161
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ISFJ
    Posts
    7

    Default

    I need help on mine (ive only been into MBTI things for a week)

    but my results:

    extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************** (26.7)
    average use
    introverted Sensing (Si) ************************************** (38.8)
    excellent use
    extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************ (24.6)
    average use
    introverted Intuiting (Ni) ******************************* (31.7)
    good use
    extraverted Thinking (Te) *************************** (27.8)
    average use
    introverted Thinking (Ti) *************************** (27.6)
    average use
    extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25.7)
    average use
    introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************ (36.7)
    excellent use

    I've tested ISFJ on other tests but now i'm not so sure if im more F or T.

  2. #162
    Senior Member Snow Turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    New cognitive test
    Fi - 16 Si - 16 Fe- 10 Ti - 8 Te- 7 Ni - 6 Se- 2 Ne- 0

    Old cognitive test
    Si - 43 |Fi - 36 Ti - 34| Fe - 32 |Ni - 27 Te - 26| Ne - 19 Se - 19

    My own interpretation is similar to the one above.

  3. #163
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Hmm interesting Maldini. You come out exactly as an ISXJ which is what I'd guess as the most accurate

  4. #164
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Kai you come out ISFJ

  5. #165
    Senior Member Snow Turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric B View Post
    As in my sig, here goes:

    Ne 47.2 Ti 44.3 Si 37.8 Fi 30.9 Te 27.7 Fe 21.7 Se 19 Ni 10.6

    Seems very accurate. Ne is out front, but still falls more into the parent rather than hero role. Just a bit overactive. With that core of introverted functions following, it still made me "I".
    Very different from most INTP results, because Ni, which is very strong in the others, is last, instead of Fe. But very close to Beebe's order, overall.
    Eric. How does the mid Fe correlate with the Supine temperament?
    Mmm. I would have expected that it would have been a more feeler dominanted temperament and phlegmatic more Ti based.

    Such high Si compared to Ni. I wonder if there's a correlation between the two, depending on focus and development. Gotta admit. Ne with Si is quite a combo.

    Quote Originally Posted by lemons View Post
    Kai you come out ISFJ
    Thanks
    No more thinking that I'm potentially ISTJ.

  6. #166
    Senior Member Snow Turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maldini View Post
    I need help on mine (ive only been into MBTI things for a week)

    but my results:

    extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************** (26.7)
    average use
    introverted Sensing (Si) ************************************** (38.8)
    excellent use
    extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************ (24.6)
    average use
    introverted Intuiting (Ni) ******************************* (31.7)
    good use
    extraverted Thinking (Te) *************************** (27.8)
    average use
    introverted Thinking (Ti) *************************** (27.6)
    average use
    extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25.7)
    average use
    introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************ (36.7)
    excellent use

    I've tested ISFJ on other tests but now i'm not so sure if im more F or T.
    I'd have gone with ISFJ. Just throwing(projecting) out some random ideas that could be useful or inaccurate assumptions.

    High Fi & Low Se = Truth or Value seeker/Non-materialism/Not drawn to the 'in the moment' experiences (Possibly seen as temporary.)

    High Fi & Mid Fe = Personal values conflicting with social values. Society might be perceived as a little superficial with it's 'fake' politeness. Ultimately personal value wins as it seen as truth, especially with Si.

    Alternatively it could just be due to less developed social Fe, however that doesn't remove the desire to be expressive towards other people.

  7. #167
    beyondaurora
    Guest

    Default

    If you don't mind, lemons, would you please analyze my latest results (different test)?

    Si (38.6)
    Fe (35.6)
    Fi (31.4)
    Te (30.2)
    Ni (28.2)
    Ne (26.3)
    Se (26.2)
    Ti (23.1)

    (My old ranking was: Fe=Se=Si=Ni>Te=Fi=Ti>Ne, which you found to be ISFJ).

    Thanks!

  8. #168
    Wannabe genius Splittet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Of course they do, because the functions themselves are unclearly defined. The theory is bullshit. The brain does not work through these 8 functions. Not a chance in hell. It's based on no empirical evidence, and has no relevance to modern psychology, just like Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis is of historical interest though, that's the difference. The only thing one can treat MBTI as, is like a bad version of Big Five.
    "Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the soul of genius." - Wolfgang Amadé Mozart

  9. #169
    Senior Member Snow Turtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Splittet View Post
    Of course they do, because the functions themselves are unclearly defined. The theory is bullshit. The brain does not work through these 8 functions. Not a chance in hell. It's based on no empirical evidence, and has no relevance to modern psychology, just like Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis is of historical interest though, that's the difference. The only thing one can treat MBTI as, is like a bad version of Big Five.
    That's abit moot point, isn't it?
    MBTI doesn't work because it tries it best to capture human nature into 16 boxes, based on 4 dichotomies. It might not be based on empirical evidence but that doesn't necessary mean that the theory is useless.

    I really don't see how Big Five has any advantage over MBTI. They both face the same problem, most personality theories do.

  10. #170
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    MBTI isn't bullshit but it does lack structure.

Similar Threads

  1. How do you and your type dress?
    By CzeCze in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 11:53 PM
  2. Do you like people of your type?
    By Azseroffs in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 10:48 AM
  3. So, are you really your type, or do you wish you were your type???
    By SillySapienne in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 10:46 AM
  4. How Do You Differ From Your Type?
    By RansomedbyFire in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 08:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO