# Thread: Fudjack/Dinkelaker Functional Preferences Instrument

1. Intuiting 12
Sensing 6
Feeling 6
Thinking 13

2. thinking =14
sensing =9
intuiting =9
feeling =5

N-F-T-S = iNfj, iNfp, eNfp, eNfj
F-N-S-T = inFp, inFj, enFj, enFp
N-T-F-S = iNtj, iNtp, eNtp, eNtj
T-N-S-F = inTp, enTj, inTj, enTp
S-F-T-N = iSfj, eSfp, iSfp, eSfj
T-S-N-F = isTp, esTj, isTj, esTp
S-T-F-N = iStj, eStp, iStp, eStj
F-S-N-T = isFp, esFj, isFj, esFp

3. Intuiting - 10
Sensing - 6
Feeling - 12
Thinking - 9

FNTS ?

4. Originally Posted by Jennifer
Score Summary

mbti type= INTP
ennea type= 5w4

intuiting =18
sensing =3
feeling =3
thinking =13

N-T-F-S = iNtj, iNtp, eNtp, eNtj

This is something I did already figure out a year or two ago -- I'm an INTP in terms of personality, but I express and rely on my N more often.

N is also a gateway into F, in some ways.
Exactly.
It is the gateway.

5. Originally Posted by heart
Fudjack/Dinkelaker Functional Preferences Instrument -
Short Form 1.1(experimental)

My result: N-F-T-S

I am still reading this and trying to fully understand it. Very interesting.

x1 > N = NFTS

what is x1?

N > x2 = NTFS

what is x2?

x2 > T = TNSF

T > y1 = TSNF

what is y1?

y1 > S = STFN

S > y2 = SFTN

what is y2?

y2 > F = FSNT

F > x1 = FNST

6. n = 12
f = 11
s = 7, t = 7

eh.

7. E/I not included?

The dichotomy of E is J and P.

You do not have the one without the other.

Should x1 be P
y1 is J.

Hence x2 is I and y2 is E.

Is y the only boundary of S?

No; we have a second boundary.

Is x the only boundary of N?

No; we have a second boundary.

What is the relationship of the second boundary of S to the first boundary of N?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of S to the second boundary of N?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of S to the first boundary of N?

What is the relationship of the second boundary of S to the second boundary of N?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of F to the second boundary of T?

What is the relationship of the second boundary of F to the first boundary of T?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of F to the first boundary of T?

What is the relationship of the second boundary of F to the second boundary of T?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of x1 to the second boundary of y1?

What is the relationship of the second boundary of x1 to the first boundary of y1?

What is the relationship of the first boundary of x1 to the first boundary of y1?

What is the relationship of the second boundary of x1 to the second boundary of y1?

8. Do you find a match?
No. It is only one look of the table.

Do you find a match if you switch the table around?
No. Then it is again only one look of the table.

When do you find the match?

9. OK. Let us find the match.

x1>N = NFTS. It reads Ne Fi Te Si hence ENFP. The zero does not count. The number is 01278.

N>x1 = NFTS. It is not ENFP. Look at the coordinate. Hence the position of zero = the moment of initiation is always ahead of the primary function.
The number is 21087 = Fi Ne Si Te = INFP. Paradoxically, zero is not in the middle = it is never a middle point. Therefore nothing is changed. Ne Fi Te Si reads 01278 and 21087. ENFP and INFP respectively.

10. Now we know E/I is reflected in the sequence of the function in the unit. Zero never changes position hence x1>N = ENFP and N>x1 = INFP.
Is x1 then E?
No. It is a dichotomy of E.

x1>F = FNST = Fe Ni Se Ti = ENFJ = 01278.

F>x1 = FNST = 21087 = Ni Fe Ti Se = INFJ.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO