Go Back   Typology Central > The Commune > The NT Rationale

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2007, 06:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
^ He pronks, too!
 
Magic Poriferan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In your closet, or under your bed, waiting for the night-light to burn out.
Posts: 6,354
Magic Poriferan is unique just like everyone else
Default INTP vs ENTP. War of objectivity!

This is a subject that first came about around a year ago or so for me.
I was trying to determine what would be the most objective type in the MBTI, and I felt confident in my accuracy when I decided that NTP would be more objective than any other three letters(to which I had some agreement from others that I know).

But I was then forced to determine if the ENTP or the INTP would be more objective, and I have been uncertain to this day.
The INTP could be assumed more subjective because of their rather self-contained means of thinking. We could argue that you'd need to pay more attention to the outer world to be objective, like an ENTP.

But look at it this way...

The ENTP gets much more caught up in the events around it. What I'm getting at here, is that you can sometimes be so deep in something that you lose sight of it. The INTP has the advantage of the "man from mars" effect. Social pressure and engineering should not have much affect on an INTP, where as they should on an ENTP.


In general, one might still be conceptually leaning toward the ENTP on this, but my question is also partly based on personal experience.
In my experience, the INTPs have been more objective than the ENTPs.
Is that just a fluke?

I guess the first function could make no difference at all, resulting in a tie.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana.


_________________________________
INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. Explained in detail here.

Also see my big ol' bowl of Enneagram.

And this is another one of my babies:
THE COMPLETE TYPE GROUPING ANALYSIS: By The Sponge.

For Christ's sake, read this book!
Magic Poriferan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 07:11 AM   #2 (permalink)
Iconoclast
 
SolitaryWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INTP
Posts: 2,926
SolitaryWalker has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan View Post
This is a subject that first came about around a year ago or so for me.
I was trying to determine what would be the most objective type in the MBTI, and I felt confident in my accuracy when I decided that NTP would be more objective than any other three letters(to which I had some agreement from others that I know).

But I was then forced to determine if the ENTP or the INTP would be more objective, and I have been uncertain to this day.
The INTP could be assumed more subjective because of their rather self-contained means of thinking. We could argue that you'd need to pay more attention to the outer world to be objective, like an ENTP.

But look at it this way...

The ENTP gets much more caught up in the events around it. What I'm getting at here, is that you can sometimes be so deep in something that you lose sight of it. The INTP has the advantage of the "man from mars" effect. Social pressure and engineering should not have much affect on an INTP, where as they should on an ENTP.


In general, one might still be conceptually leaning toward the ENTP on this, but my question is also partly based on personal experience.
In my experience, the INTPs have been more objective than the ENTPs.
Is that just a fluke?

I guess the first function could make no difference at all, resulting in a tie.

INTP is more objective because of the stronger Thinking preferrence.
__________________
'And the great deadly serpent Superstition, bred of fear and ignorance, keeps watch on the treasure of knowledge. Only he who has slain the serpent and knows not fear can bestride Odin's horse and ride through the wall of fire; only he who wields Odin's sword can draw near to that sleeping might and beauty, and sunder the stifling links of mail, and show the divine face to men.'

'To be a philosopher,you must first be a Spinozist; if you have not Spinozism, you have no philosophy at all' Hegel
SolitaryWalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 07:17 AM   #3 (permalink)
^ He pronks, too!
 
Magic Poriferan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In your closet, or under your bed, waiting for the night-light to burn out.
Posts: 6,354
Magic Poriferan is unique just like everyone else
Default

Oh, yes.... that.

Using that logic, that should mean an ENTJ is as objective as an INTP?
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana.


_________________________________
INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. Explained in detail here.

Also see my big ol' bowl of Enneagram.

And this is another one of my babies:
THE COMPLETE TYPE GROUPING ANALYSIS: By The Sponge.

For Christ's sake, read this book!
Magic Poriferan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 07:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Iconoclast
 
SolitaryWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INTP
Posts: 2,926
SolitaryWalker has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan View Post
Oh, yes.... that.

Using that logic, that should mean an ENTJ is as objective as an INTP?
Slightly less, because Te is further away from the quintissence of Thinking than Ti. All introverted functions are stronger than the extroverted because the essence of all cognitive process inheres within the unconscious mind. Introverts are closer to the unconscious because they are more internally focused.
__________________
'And the great deadly serpent Superstition, bred of fear and ignorance, keeps watch on the treasure of knowledge. Only he who has slain the serpent and knows not fear can bestride Odin's horse and ride through the wall of fire; only he who wields Odin's sword can draw near to that sleeping might and beauty, and sunder the stifling links of mail, and show the divine face to men.'

'To be a philosopher,you must first be a Spinozist; if you have not Spinozism, you have no philosophy at all' Hegel
SolitaryWalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:04 AM   #5 (permalink)
~dangerous curves ahead~
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: ENTP
Posts: 3,500
white is unique just like everyone else
Default

Speaking from personal experience from 27 years living as an ENTP with an INTP:

I'd put my money on the INTP.

Reason: While both are fascinated by thoughts and possibilities, the ENTP is more likely to enjoy just having a multitude of shiny possibilities to play with, vs the INTP, who's more likely to toss and turn and pry open a single, golden sphere. So while both think objectively, I'd say the INTP objectively thinks things through, while the ENTP just has objective thoughts diarrhoea.
white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
~dangerous curves ahead~
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: ENTP
Posts: 3,500
white is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWing View Post
Slightly less, because Te is further away from the quintissence of Thinking than Ti. All introverted functions are stronger than the extroverted because the essence of all cognitive process inheres within the unconscious mind. Introverts are closer to the unconscious because they are more internally focused.
That's an interesting one - what about the INTJ vs INTP then?
white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
Sophisticated Primate
 
Night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTJ
Posts: 4,345
Night is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aelan View Post
That's an interesting one - what about the INTJ vs INTP then?
Your typical, run-of-the-mill INTJ will probably lose to an equally-normal INTP.
Night is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
^ He pronks, too!
 
Magic Poriferan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In your closet, or under your bed, waiting for the night-light to burn out.
Posts: 6,354
Magic Poriferan is unique just like everyone else
Default

Yes... the INTJ would definitely lose.

I still question, I mean severely question, the part of the MBTI system that arbitrarily dictates that J and P are reversed for I's...
I mean, it seems both weird and unhelpful at the same time... and perhaps just plainly untrue.

Does it really seem like an INTP is more focused on the Judging function and an INTJ is more focused on the Perceiving function? It doesn't to me.
Aside from that, why not just switch the names and call the INTP the INTJ and the INTJ the INTP?
Am I the only one that thinks it seems extremely pointless to have a so-called "perceiver" focus more on the judging function?
Just seems like a flaw in naming convention...

...if it's even true.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana.


_________________________________
INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. Explained in detail here.

Also see my big ol' bowl of Enneagram.

And this is another one of my babies:
THE COMPLETE TYPE GROUPING ANALYSIS: By The Sponge.

For Christ's sake, read this book!
Magic Poriferan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:15 AM   #9 (permalink)
Iconoclast
 
SolitaryWalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INTP
Posts: 2,926
SolitaryWalker has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan View Post
Yes... the INTJ would definitely lose.

I still question, I mean severely question, the part of the MBTI system that arbitrarily dictates that J and P are reversed for I's...
I mean, it seems both weird and unhelpful at the same time... and perhaps just plainly untrue.

Does it really seem like an INTP is more focused on the Judging function and an INTJ is more focused on the Perceiving function? It doesn't to me.
Aside from that, why not just switch the names and call the INTP the INTJ and the INTJ the INTP?
Am I the only one that thinks it seems extremely pointless to have a so-called "perceiver" focus more on the judging function?
Just seems like a flaw in naming convention...

...if it's even true.
The INTJ would 'lose' because he is less objective( less T energy) due to the secondary nature of T, and extroversion of Thinking in comparison to INTP's dominant Introverted Thinking.
__________________
'And the great deadly serpent Superstition, bred of fear and ignorance, keeps watch on the treasure of knowledge. Only he who has slain the serpent and knows not fear can bestride Odin's horse and ride through the wall of fire; only he who wields Odin's sword can draw near to that sleeping might and beauty, and sunder the stifling links of mail, and show the divine face to men.'

'To be a philosopher,you must first be a Spinozist; if you have not Spinozism, you have no philosophy at all' Hegel
SolitaryWalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:19 AM   #10 (permalink)
Sophisticated Primate
 
Night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTJ
Posts: 4,345
Night is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWing View Post
The INTJ would 'lose' because he is less objective( less T energy) due to the secondary nature of T, and extroversion of Thinking in comparison to INTP's dominant Introverted Thinking.
Precisely.
Night is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
enfp vs entp findthejake What's my Type? 34 12-23-2007 04:53 PM
How Do you Tell an INTP from an ENTP prof? Usehername The NT Rationale 14 11-08-2007 05:51 PM
ENTp. HeavyMetal Welcomes and Introductions 14 10-30-2007 01:52 PM
ESTJ + ENTP? hotmale The NT Rationale 12 10-19-2007 01:44 AM
ENTP or ESTP? INTJMom MBTI (tm) and other personality matrices 28 10-13-2007 09:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0