Jonny
null
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 3,137
- MBTI Type
- FREE
I need an NT to help me. Please.
I believe that no person is actually in control of what he does. He thinks he is in control, but in reality he is only witness to the physical workings of his brain. The perception of choice is really the perception of conflicting preferences, with one preference ultimately manifesting temporary dominance. This idea stems from our understanding of strokes, brain tumors, medications/drugs affecting consciousness. This also stems from the nature of control.
To control, one must have a preference for something, and one must exert some type of force in order to acheive that preference. A rock might cause the death of a person by falling from a ledge onto his head, but we would not say that rock is in control of that person's life. The rock lacks the desire or motivation necessary to be in control. (I'm going to stop you here if you believe the rock was in control, because that belief will not help me with my issues.) Who or what controls preference, that essential part of our understanding of control? If we were to say that we control our preferences, well then we'd need a preference for our preferences. Who controls those? Ultimately it would lead to events prior to our existence, thus removing ultimate control of our lives from our grasp.
I have studied biology extensively, and have a deep grasp of the very basic nature of biological events. I know, for example, that mitochondria do not magically produce ATP and know how to do so. They are simply structured (chemically speaking) in such a way so that the presence of certain external chemicals will result in reactions leading to that production (I won't go into the entire cycle due to a need for brevity). Biologists even go as far as explaining why certain behaviors manifest themselves in humans, and do so from a purely structural standpoint. Why then, if all our parts are considered matter bound by the laws of nature, are humans not viewed as mere matter moving through space, bound by the laws of nature?
These beliefs, that we are nothing but matter, have caused in me a general psychosis, for lack of a better classification. I no longer enjoy school, work, social interactions. I have no motivation to live. I cannot enjoy love, I cannot enjoy sex, and I am brought to mild tears while writing this. I do not think that I am wrong, although I do think I am insane (look up the definition of insane).
What I need from you NTs: Prove me wrong. Show me that we are more. I really want to live again. I don't want to kill myself. Please. I am saying this with utter seriousness. I cannot simply ignore it and live for the moment. There is more, and I really wish I could expain it better, but I am not intelligent enough to do so. I am existentialist to the extreme.
Edit: I see such ignorance in the world. People are so blind to the truths, and for good reason. Those who are not, do not wish to live.
I believe that no person is actually in control of what he does. He thinks he is in control, but in reality he is only witness to the physical workings of his brain. The perception of choice is really the perception of conflicting preferences, with one preference ultimately manifesting temporary dominance. This idea stems from our understanding of strokes, brain tumors, medications/drugs affecting consciousness. This also stems from the nature of control.
To control, one must have a preference for something, and one must exert some type of force in order to acheive that preference. A rock might cause the death of a person by falling from a ledge onto his head, but we would not say that rock is in control of that person's life. The rock lacks the desire or motivation necessary to be in control. (I'm going to stop you here if you believe the rock was in control, because that belief will not help me with my issues.) Who or what controls preference, that essential part of our understanding of control? If we were to say that we control our preferences, well then we'd need a preference for our preferences. Who controls those? Ultimately it would lead to events prior to our existence, thus removing ultimate control of our lives from our grasp.
I have studied biology extensively, and have a deep grasp of the very basic nature of biological events. I know, for example, that mitochondria do not magically produce ATP and know how to do so. They are simply structured (chemically speaking) in such a way so that the presence of certain external chemicals will result in reactions leading to that production (I won't go into the entire cycle due to a need for brevity). Biologists even go as far as explaining why certain behaviors manifest themselves in humans, and do so from a purely structural standpoint. Why then, if all our parts are considered matter bound by the laws of nature, are humans not viewed as mere matter moving through space, bound by the laws of nature?
These beliefs, that we are nothing but matter, have caused in me a general psychosis, for lack of a better classification. I no longer enjoy school, work, social interactions. I have no motivation to live. I cannot enjoy love, I cannot enjoy sex, and I am brought to mild tears while writing this. I do not think that I am wrong, although I do think I am insane (look up the definition of insane).
What I need from you NTs: Prove me wrong. Show me that we are more. I really want to live again. I don't want to kill myself. Please. I am saying this with utter seriousness. I cannot simply ignore it and live for the moment. There is more, and I really wish I could expain it better, but I am not intelligent enough to do so. I am existentialist to the extreme.
Edit: I see such ignorance in the world. People are so blind to the truths, and for good reason. Those who are not, do not wish to live.