• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

[Kiersey] informative and directive, or feeling and thinking

Mustafa

Permabanned
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
471
MBTI Type
INFP
In the three letter acronyms in Keirseys Temprament Sorter (like SFJ), the roles, then I notice that Feelers mostly are informative, and thinkers mostly are directive, there are one exception each. NTP and NFJ. NFJ is directive despite it is a feeler, and NTP is informative despite it is a thinker. ^^

So what is the deal with NFJ and NTP? Are they opposits? Is it normal for Ti to be informative and supine and submissive? Is that the normal state?

And if Fe is directive in NFJ, why isnt SFJ directive? Although the SFJs (two) i know are powerful and prone to masculinity and power. Maybe SFJ is the weakest of the powerful, and NFJ the most powerful of the weak (and sensitive and democratic).

Do you have other perspectives on this role thing, outlines?
 
Top