SE = Elves and SI = hobbits?

[1487610420]

obviously the planetarium to injection into the tragic story of the celestial bodies affecting present moment houses is casting its shadow over the relationship between typology functions in n out rawcliffe samson between the different types also because of the uneventful relationship with function type of pathology is visible a present in other theories as well install talking therapies characters as more so than not following the topic with van in a relationship of the participants.

 

[Oaky]

I like dark elves

Drows don't look like that!!!

I am of the opinion that heretofore, but also to be considered, while also not discounting the aforementioned subject, which is not unlike what is being discussed presently.

That doesn't explain why I am, in fact, hot.

he said, unaware of the irony of an INFp with a wifebeater, tasteless jewelry and the dead flat eyes of a sociopath

you dont wanna step up against me dude, ill leave your fucking type in shambles

Genetics?

I'm not sure I follow ?

 

[GarrotTheThief]

so back to my first train of logic...

SE is more overt in terms of sneak...hence elves
SI is more about thieving sneaky like a bunglar or hobbit...you know?

SI is more like...I know the lay of the land and which corridor leads to trinkets....where as SE IS LIKE...I'll slide down that branch while shooting this arrow from this sylban bow into an orc face.

 

[cm81]

I wonder what Smeagol would be. INFJ? ISFP?

Definitely an ISFJ

 

[senza tema]

Go on then, go and report me
I'm English, try and deport me

 

[HongDou]

no1 cares what smeagol is smh scrub

 

[Oaky]

so back to my first train of logic...

SE is more overt in terms of sneak...hence elves
SI is more about thieving sneaky like a bunglar or hobbit...you know?

Can't see this. Elves are refined characters, their movements are also refined, hence Si.

 

[1487610420]

There are currently 30 users browsing this thread. (13 members and 17 guests)

 

[Opal]

I wonder what Smeagol would be. INFJ? ISFP?

I think INFJ because her inferior SE drove her to dangerous physical pleasures. .

 

[Ingrid in grids]

Luv the movies. Daniel Radcliffe was great.

 

[senza tema]

Anyway, both elves and hobbits are Si-valuers. Duh, OP. Learn to socionics.

 

[Oaky]

Go on then, go and report me
I'm English, try and deport me

Definitely an ISFJ

I see this.

no1 cares what smeagol is smh scrub

I have replies. peeps care.

I think INFJ because her inferior SE drove him to physicla pleasures that were bad for her.

I see this too.

 

[HongDou]

I have replies. peeps care.

yes, and they're no1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[Oaky]

yes, and they're no1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Are you saying they have no value? I have care for such people. They are good friends and are of very high value.

 

[HongDou]

Are you saying they have no value? I have care for such people. They are good friends and are of very high value.

no value? i prefer name brand

 

[Opal]

yes, and they're no1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I like you... even if you are mistyped.

 

[HongDou]

I like you... even if you are mistyped.

this has been a lesson in trust

consider your lesson learned ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[GarrotTheThief]

Anyway, both elves and hobbits are Si-valuers. Duh, OP. Learn to socionics.

DATS WHAT I WAS ASKIN FOR DOUGH

 

[Oaky]

no value? i prefer name brand

Ah, chanaynay.
My initial (offtopic) post was meant to be seen as a bit of fun. Not taken seriously at all yet you've replied in a slightly offensive manner which perhaps means you took slight offence. This thread in itself is a fun little thread made with the intention of enjoyment more than seriousness. You've started resorting to indirect insults to people you don't know so I'm not currently going to continue this conversation as it was not intended.

 

[Evee]

I personally like my avi the best tbh because it's my true self.