User Tag List

First 23456 Last

Results 31 to 40 of 105

  1. #31
    nee andante bechimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doomkid View Post
    that's another bullshit, the hierarchy order that for example ISTJ shadow would be an ESTP, but let's live this for another thread

    btw: you don't need to explain me dominant auxiliary tertiary and inferior functions, I'm aware of those
    Based on your responses to me, I really, really need to explain JCF to you. Fortunately, I'm tired of your attitude so I won't bother. But my advice is to learn some stuff before you open your mouth use your fingers.

  2. #32
    Senior Member Doomkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andante View Post
    Based on your responses to me, I really, really need to explain JCF to you. Fortunately, I'm tired of your attitude so I won't bother. But my advice is to learn some stuff before you open your mouth use your fingers.
    sorry, but you started it

  3. #33
    nee andante bechimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doomkid View Post
    sorry, but you started it
    For posting in your thread?

    It's always the way. Feelers rejecting Jung's theories because they don't like their type.

  4. #34
    Senior Member Doomkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andante View Post
    For posting in your thread?

    It's always the way. Feelers rejecting Jung's theories because they don't like their type.
    you started when you tried to school me on the functions assuming that I didn't know, I'm tired of these copy and paste bullshit, and I'm not even gonna comment on you being condescending agaisnt feelers, your mask just dropped right there

  5. #35
    nee andante bechimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,023

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doomkid View Post
    you started when you tried to school me on the functions assuming that I didn't know, I'm tired of these copy and paste bullshit, and I'm not even gonna comment on you being condescending agaisnt feelers, your mask just dropped right there
    Bizarre. Feeler freak out. Time to exit, stage left.

  6. #36
    Senior Member Doomkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andante View Post
    Bizarre. Feeler freak out. Time to exit, stage left.
    what? no, let's argue please


    ...well whatever then

  7. #37
    Senior Member Alea_iacta_est's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Socionics
    ILI
    Posts
    1,838

    Default

    Ah, classic Fi vs Te, how dulcet.

  8. #38
    Senior Member Doomkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alea_iacta_est View Post
    Ah, classic Fi vs Te, how dulcet.
    lol, I think I just found my opposite

  9. #39
    Analytical Dreamer Coriolis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/sx
    Posts
    17,538

    Default

    A dichotomy does not require mutual exclusivity. Many definitions of the term are along the lines of "a difference between two opposite things : a division into two opposite groups". Thinking and feeling can be seen as two such groups, opposites, but not mutually exclusive; each of us has some of each, much as the yin and yang. The degree to which we prefer one over the other falls on a continuum, as do the distinctions below.

    Quote Originally Posted by Doomkid View Post
    1. sensitive people.........thick skinned people (that is one dichotomy)

    2. logical people...............ilogical/instinctive people (that is another dichotomy)
    I've been called a criminal, a terrorist, and a threat to the known universe. But everything you were told is a lie. The truth is, they've taken our freedom, our home, and our future. The time has come for all humanity to take a stand...

  10. #40
    Senior Member Doomkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coriolis View Post
    A dichotomy does not require mutual exclusivity. Many definitions of the term are along the lines of "a difference between two opposite things : a division into two opposite groups". Thinking and feeling can be seen as two such groups, opposites, but not mutually exclusive; each of us has some of each, much as the yin and yang. The degree to which we prefer one over the other falls on a continuum, as do the distinctions below.
    ok, cool I got that and I agree, my problem is with the descriptions about thinking a feeling we find all over the internet including official mbti site http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-p...or-feeling.asp

Similar Threads

  1. [MBTItm] Adam-12: GREAT Display Of Thinking Vs. Feeling
    By LauraIngallsWalton in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-21-2017, 04:19 AM
  2. Thinking vs Feeling
    By Eastwood in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-25-2015, 04:07 PM
  3. Thinking Vs Feeling
    By oxymoron in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-18-2010, 05:14 PM
  4. [MBTItm] Thinking vs Feeling...a false dichotomy?
    By Provoker in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 162
    Last Post: 02-06-2010, 02:48 PM
  5. Thinking vs. Feeling: What if...
    By Nonsensical in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 11:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO