You cannot productively debate a generalization simply by throwing out additional, equally unsubstantiated generalizations. That is not a debate, it is a free-for-all. Better to start assembling evidence for and against the generalization, or offering alternative generalizations supported by evidence and reason. There is nothing wrong with offering anecdotal evidence; it alone, however, will not support a convincing conclusion.
i am not sure if you posted as a member or as a mod, i thought it was the later, and under that assumption - allowing a main topic to generalize but not the posts about it seem to limit the debate to disagreeing with the OP (technically my posts do disagree with the OP, but thats besides the point). if you meant it as advice on how to not try to convince others of a point, thats true.
It'd be peculiar to pay you for your services if they had already come in as a specific type. That in itself just looks bad; if they were solely interested in being desirable – that approach is clearly filled with error. I'd counsel them on decision-making and effective planning first and foremost (in regard to people), and maybe throw in some lessons on diplomacy.
Cool – it sounded like a possibilityI see.I worked with EEG in a medical setting.
See - even this short explanation acknowledges the limits of your comment, making it more reasonable and less likely to offend.
The worth of my comments should be independent of my status as a mod. I might have given the same advice as a member, and in fact probably have given similar on other threads. Comments like the one below are clearly posted as a mod:
