User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Posts
    353

    Default Do Ti and Te map onto deduction vs. induction?

    I often try to avoid going through all the details of something, instead reasoning about why something must be true based on its similarity to something else. This kind of reasoning appeals to me because it's very efficient and effective. Why do all the hard work of a formal bottom-up proof when you can prove something using abstract principles? When I use this kind of reasoning with Te's they often tune me out because they think it can't possibly be that easy.

    It reminds me of abstract nonsense in mathematics. What basically happened is that category theorists came around and demonstrated that they could simplify super detailed mathematical proofs into just a few steps. Many mathematicians didn't take kindly to this new development. But I love it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_nonsense

    What do you think?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    MBTI
    NFJ
    Posts
    62

    Default

    As for the title, probably not. But I've had the same thought myself. Why not look for clues in Jung?

    As for Abstract nonsense, interesting notion. Category theory is one of my prized finds.

    I'm a sucker for simple proofs.

  3. #3
    Member chaoticbrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    MBTI
    NeTi
    Enneagram
    6 sx
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Ti is better for deductive reasoning.
    Te is better for inductive reasoning.

  4. #4
    Member chaoticbrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    MBTI
    NeTi
    Enneagram
    6 sx
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Double post.

  5. #5
    Theta Male Julius_Van_Der_Beak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    PORG
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII None
    Posts
    9,053

    Default

    I'm not sure, but for what it's worth, I remember finding deductive proofs much easier and more natural than inductive proofs.
    [Trump's] rhetoric is not an abuse of power. In the same way that it's also not against the law to do a backflip off of the roof of your house onto your concrete driveway. It's just mind-numbingly stupid and, to say the least, counterproductive. - Bush did 9-11


    This is not going to go the way you think....

    Visit my Johari:
    http://kevan.org/johari?name=Birddude78

  6. #6
    Cheeseburgers freeeekyyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    ILI Te
    Posts
    1,387

    Default

    They're both deductive. Induction is intuitive.
    You lose.

    _______

    RCOEI
    Melancholic-Choleric
    Respectful Leader

    Johari Window|Nohari Window

Similar Threads

  1. Is it possible that I may be using some combination of Fi, Te, Ti, and Te?
    By The Great One in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 08-19-2016, 07:38 PM
  2. Ti and Te arguing: The film critic vs. the lawyer
    By The Great One in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 08-24-2013, 06:22 PM
  3. Ti and Te
    By Silveresque in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 10-10-2011, 04:27 PM
  4. Could I have mixed Ti and Te?
    By UnitOfPopulation in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 04:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO