Though much of the comparison has merit, Dawkins is INTJ, so it's misapplied. "The God Delusion" is a polemical rant, as are all of his anti-religious programmes. I couldn't get all the way through it, it was so toxic. They're both batshit crazy, but Hitchins is funnier.
You're slightly more subtle than most though. Probably because you're more needy when it comes to approval. You lurch between being solicitous and totally objectionable. It's slightly dizzying. You remind me of Gingko, in that respect. Same self-righteous preachiness too...
I wonder what makes you think my internal dialogue is any business of yours? Do you really expect me to explain myself to you? Do you really expect me to be interested in the details of your failure to read my character? How curious! I think I've already shown exceptional tolerance and patience when it comes to you, don't push it.
If you genuinely believe my attitude is one of "fuck these idiots", one has to wonder why you haven't put me on ignore (rather than the other way around) instead of repeatedly calling me into your threads. I mean, what could you possibly hope to gain from such a person, other than a giant "Fuck You!" ? Is that what you want? To be scolded? Some people are freaky that way... Perhaps you think attacking me will improve your standing in some way? Perhaps you think you'll provoke me into some infraction? You clearly want some kind of reaction. But you'll have to spell it out. Unlike you, I don't enjoy playing guessing games about people's motivations.
Alternatively, might I suggest you focus more on the content of a discussion and less on your speculations about me. I think it would improve the quality of your posts considerably. It would certainly make you less ignorable.