Ok let us put aside for a minute the fact that that this has most likely been done to death and let us also put aside the fact that we could argue till the universe implodes or errodes or explodes when it comes to it's definition, or whether it even exists. So let us pretend that we do agree on what it means and that it does exist in a clearly defined manner.
The point is there is a slight consensus ive noticed at times, (not necessarily on here), whereby an F type is naturally considered to be more emotionally intelligent over a T type.
This is a massive simplification I know, but I was wondering what people's thoughts were on this?
Sorry it isn't a more flexible option to discuss. Mainly I wonder this because I consider myself to be an F type, without too much of a doubt and I think most would not disagree. However my emotional intelligence is extremely low, I am never able to manage my negative emotions effectively and it results in a slow build up to an explosion which results in self-defeating tendencies.
This could be in part to my very mild aspergers....or it could just be that im just not intelligent in that manner and perhaps never will be.
The point im wondering on is if there is any correlation at all for this, or whether it is just bullshit thrown out on the breeze?