What's Your Alignment?

[Hazashin]

I usually get neutral good or true neutral. I voted neutral good in the poll because it sounds better.

I don't understand how anyone can get anything other than a variation of Good, but whatever.

 

[Such Irony]

I don't understand how anyone can get anything other than a variation of Good, but whatever.

I don't understand how someone can be lawful and evil. Those two just don't seem to mesh together well.

 

[Rail Tracer]

I don't understand how anyone can get anything other than a variation of Good, but whatever.

Good is just a definition. Both good and evil are the different sides of the same coin. One's inherent good is another person's inherent evil and vice versa. Once you see that, your attitude starts moving towards neutral. That is, however, unless the person still wants to be in their eyes, inherently "good" or inherently "evil."

 

[SingSmileShine]

Neutral Good. I've always been. Every test, plus instinct, tells me that I'm NG. I'm the definition of it.

 

[Hazashin]

Good is just a definition. Both good and evil are the different sides of the same coin. One's inherent good is another person's inherent evil and vice versa. Once you see that, your attitude starts moving towards neutral. That is, however, unless the person still wants to be in their eyes, inherently "good" or inherently "evil."

I meant the alignment's definition of "Good".

 

[Zarathustra]

Good is just a definition. Both good and evil are the different sides of the same coin. One's inherent good is another person's inherent evil and vice versa. Once you see that, your attitude starts moving towards neutral. That is, however, unless the person still wants to be in their eyes, inherently "good" or inherently "evil."

Flabby relativism

 

[Demy]

I got Neutral Good.
So did most everyone else, I see.

 

[Within]

I wish that I could really understand what is good and what is evil.

I consider all of the d&d alignment tests, and the system itself to be massively flawed in the sense that it is described as linear, when in my limited understanding of the concept I recognize the lawfully good to be the closest one to the chaotic evil ones.

I think that the true neutral ones are the most "good" people simply because they are inherently transcended above the whole idea of good and evil.

Indifference is bliss?

I don't understand how someone can be lawful and evil. Those two just don't seem to mesh together well.

Such irony.

I don't understand how anyone can get anything other than a variation of Good, but whatever.

It's because the illusion of what is good, obviously it varies in individuals. I'll explain that with a really good statement, and one of the most denied ones.

"Altruistic people are the most egoistic ones."

 

[A window to the soul]

I took one of the tests. I am chaotic evil.

 

[chickpea]

I don't understand how anyone can get anything other than a variation of Good, but whatever.

by being honest with themselves

 

[Rasofy]

I wish that I could really understand what is good and what is evil.

I consider all of the d&d alignment tests, and the system itself to be massively flawed in the sense that it is described as linear, when in my limited understanding of the concept I recognize the lawfully good to be the closest one to the chaotic evil ones.

That said, do you relate to the Neutral Evil descriptions?
(You're the only one whose supposed ''evil'' alignment I took seriously)

 

[Within]

That said, do you relate to the Neutral Evil descriptions?
(You're the only one whose supposed ''evil'' alignment I took seriously)

I guess that I can relate to it in a way. But apparently being egotistical is the same thing as being evil.

 

[Rasofy]

I guess that I can relate to it in a way. But apparently being egotistical is the same thing as being evil.

I can see that. Interesting.

As a neutral, I value reciprocity a lot. Be kind to me, and I'll be kind to you. Be mean to me, and you are in my blacklist. I'm not interested in being a ''hero'', but it's hard to imagine myself being mean to someone that didn't deserve. Unless my life or freedom is at risk, but those are really extreme scenarios.

 

[Totenkindly]

I don't understand how someone can be lawful and evil. Those two just don't seem to mesh together well.

Nazis.
Bureacracy.
Corporations.

It seems common enough to me.

 

[Mal12345]

You Scored as Chaotic Evil
A Chaotic Evil person is destructive to the extreme. These people put no value in life or beauty, taking pleasure in destroying both what is good and what is ordered. They have little to no respect for laws and the rights of others. Revenge is a powerful motivator for these people.

WTF???

 

[MacGuffin]

You Scored as Chaotic Evil
A Chaotic Evil person is destructive to the extreme. These people put no value in life or beauty, taking pleasure in destroying both what is good and what is ordered. They have little to no respect for laws and the rights of others. Revenge is a powerful motivator for these people.

WTF???

You were too selfish in your answers, you narcissitic sociopath!

 

[Mal12345]

You were too selfish in your answers, you narcissitic sociopath!

Ahhh yes, I'm just like Stewie, always planning and plotting something eeee-vil. And I'm about as capable of it as Stewie, except he has a ray gun and stuff, the lucky little shit.

 

[Hazashin]

It's because the illusion of what is good, obviously it varies in individuals. I'll explain that with a really good statement, and one of the most denied ones.

"Altruistic people are the most egoistic ones."

If you're a 2, yeah.

 

[Hazashin]

by being honest with themselves

Are you saying that I'm not being honest with myself?

 

[chickpea]

Are you saying that I'm not being honest with myself?

not necessarily, but who doesn't want to think of themselves as a good person? that doesn't mean in reality when those situations arise that it's always going to be the case.