don't need alot of intelligence to be a great king. All you need to do is tell everyone the divine right of kings, and execute anyone who disagree with you. If you had those qualities, you will make a good king.
True enough. I resort back to my original post here. It's why kings should die.
When first reading the title of this thread, I wondered whether people would realize that they will not talk about which type would make the best king but about which attributes the best king would have, and that discussing the latter by means of type is really but a very roundabout way of coming to the point.
You don't need alot of intelligence to be a great king. All you need to do is tell everyone the divine right of kings, and execute anyone who disagree with you. If you had those qualities, you will make a good king.
You just need to be smart enough to surround yourself with good advisors, and follow their advice. I have read that Eisenhower was especially good at this.
Hope is the denial of reality. It is the carrot dangled before the draft horse to keep him plodding along in a vain attempt to reach it. We should remove the carrot and walk forward with our eyes open. -- Raistlin Majere
Also an Es ability is defined by those they surround themselves with. EPs ability is different then EJs. EJs are based on advisors knowledge/expertise. An EPs ability is based on adaptability of those around them. IJs are based on internal knowledge, and IP on internal adaptability.
Take what I say with a grain of salt, because that's all it is compared to the ocean of complexity when it comes to actions and real life.
Why, because I disagree with your view that NTJs makes the best king, and we should all suck your dick?
No, because what you said was stupid.
In fact, most of what you say is stupid.
Of all the posters on this board, I would say the amount of dumb posts you write per post written is among the very highest.
For two years now, I have just mostly ignored you, occasionally responding to some inane post of yours to point this out.
And, based on your lackluster response here, I see why you have always refrained from responding.
Originally Posted by _Poki_
EPs ability is different then EJs. EJs are based on advisors knowledge/expertise. An EPs ability is based on adaptability of those around them. IJs are based on internal knowledge, and IP on internal adaptability.
This is all extremely suspect.
And I would go so far as to say that the last sentence, at least for Ni-doms (maybe not Si-doms), should actually be in reverse.
It is Ni that is known for internal adaptability, and Ti and Si that are not.
Tbh, though, I don't really feel like discussing this topic.
Your definitions are too ambiguous.
The Justice Fighter
XXXX - XwX Xdw XwX sx/so - Neutral Good
"I trust what you are doing though…I just see it a little differently.
I don’t see it as you stepping away from the fire. I see it as the fire directing your course.
No matter how airy or earthy or watery you become... to many of us you will always be...a super nova."
"Behind these gates of seeming warmth sits, loosely chained, a fierce attack dog. Perhaps not crazy, but dangerous"