• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Changing type?

epp

New member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
150
MBTI Type
entp
Enneagram
7w8
As much as I understand, the type shows what people actually PREFER to use and I'm pretty sure this won't change (unless perhaps one already is borderline-something anyway). But it is possible to learn to handle the opposite functions and get quite comfortable at them. For example, I am extremely N, but I actually pay special attention to experience and grow S. So I could 'switch it on' when needed... But never mind how good I might get at S, I'm sure I'll always PREFER to use N by default. Something like that.
 

Wild horses

New member
Joined
Oct 25, 2008
Messages
1,916
MBTI Type
ENFP
I am curious about this also and it came up in another thread; I know someone who was very into MBTI and claimed that they were an INTP however, now they frequently test as ISTJ which I feel is qute a jump, however, there are several factors that may have a bearing on such a dramatic change this person went through several life changing events several years ago and also had a neurological problem as part of an accident, although they have recovered almost everyone who knew him previously agree that he has changed throughout his life. Not sure though if this can be considered as a definite change to another type or an INTP with a neurological problem if you know what I mean... I can;t imagine evolving into a different type mind you for a ENFP it might just be a case of growing up :D:D
 

laughingebony

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
236
MBTI Type
INTP
The consensus in this thread seems to be that it is not possible for a person's type to change. However, all support for this has been given in the form of either a simple statement of belief or a generalization from a particular instance to all instances. Can anyone provide a plausible explanation for why it can't happen? Or even reasonable proof that it can't happen?

TheChosenOne said:
It's possible, mine drastically changed a few times in the past.

Given that TheChosenOne isn't lying or deluded, this is sufficient to disprove the proposition, "it can't happen."
 

NewEra

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
3,104
MBTI Type
I
Given that TheChosenOne isn't lying or deluded, this is sufficient to disprove the proposition, "it can't happen."

Yeah, I was surely an ESP child, and changed significantly at age 10. ISTJ all the way up to around age 19, when stress and other factors caused a shift to ESTP. Changed back a year later.
 

Llewellyn

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
330
MBTI Type
INtj
Enneagram
9w1
I wonder if people believe it is possible to change your true type. I am not talking about being mistyped, thinking you were an INTP and turning out to be an INFP, but something much more drastic. Maybe like actually evolving into an INFP to ESJP or something (a huge stretch, I know!).

I personally do not believe that such a thing is possible. I was posting on another forum about this and people are really attacking me for my opinion. I think all they hear me saying is "people never change," but that isn't what I really mean. I believe people can change their habits, learn new things, better themselves and just become more well rounded, but essentially they will always be the same type. I can learn to organize my notebooks better, but that won't turn me into a J.

Tell me what you think!

I think more or less the same. That's boring, right? ;) As was mentioned elsewhere, the function order might change, and might be a good development, but your main type will stay the same. Your type is often also visible in your basic appearance, and I don't guess that changes too much.
 

NewEra

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
3,104
MBTI Type
I
I think more or less the same. That's boring, right? ;) As was mentioned elsewhere, the function order might change, and might be a good development, but your main type will stay the same. Your type is often also visible in your basic appearance, and I don't guess that changes too much.

But if your function order changes enough, won't your main type change?
 

laughingebony

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
236
MBTI Type
INTP
But if your function order changes enough, won't your main type change?

It will, indeed, since one's type is defined by her function order, at least under the Myers/Briggs/Jung theory. Kiersey kind of dismissed cognitive functions.
 

Llewellyn

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
330
MBTI Type
INtj
Enneagram
9w1
Yeah, I was surely an ESP child, and changed significantly at age 10. ISTJ all the way up to around age 19, when stress and other factors caused a shift to ESTP. Changed back a year later.

This calls for an analysis. My first reaction: I don't believe this. Then so what happened is that under stress a.o. you developed dominant Se, secondary Ti, where you first had dominant Si and secondary Te. Superficially, it looks like you changed orientation of your dominant S and secondary T. I suppose this could well be possible, since an SiTe will typically have fairly well developed SeTi. Another association: you might've temporarily shifted to an ISTJ's right brain double agents (see here).
Now, I guess it is possible that under stress a left brainer can shift to his right brain.
Since you say you were an ESP child, it could also be the other way around, that you shifted to an ESTP's left brain double agents (being SiTe).
But you consider yourself an ISTj now. I'm wondering if you're an ISTJ who used to be more 'social' (i mean, whatever that is) when you were young? It's hard to say, this is my take for now.

But if your function order changes enough, won't your main type change?
It's whatever you take as your basis. I would never take one, but see from multiple how the picture evolves.

It will, indeed, since one's type is defined by her function order, at least under the Myers/Briggs/Jung theory. Kiersey kind of dismissed cognitive functions.
I don't agree. Your function order typically leaves room open for multiple types.
 

StephMC

Controlled Mischief
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
1,044
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
The consensus in this thread seems to be that it is not possible for a person's type to change. However, all support for this has been given in the form of either a simple statement of belief or a generalization from a particular instance to all instances. Can anyone provide a plausible explanation for why it can't happen? Or even reasonable proof that it can't happen?"

This is a tricky topic. Your four primary function types, especially your first two, pretty much rules out a lot of other types you could be. Granted, it's not always going to be in the same order. My Se scores higher than my Ti sometimes, but the rest of my function order looks ISTPish, and there's no way I'm an extrovert. So no, your function order is not always going to -exactly- line up to your type. What -is not- likely is that an ISTP would have a strong and healthy Fi or Ne (My 7th and 8th functions).

But completely altering your function order? Now your four primary functions develop throughout life. Keep in mind that as a child, your primary function is really the only one that's developing. So TheChosenOne, for example was primarily an Si child. I can imagine an Si child looking like an ESP, simply because they're craving data all the time. Especially when you're still developing preferences at this time... He was developing both Si and Se, but Si took role of his primary function, and Se as a shadow function to his Si. Next, in your teens, you develop your second function. Your third comes in roughly around your 20s, and your fourth comes in around 30ish or so.

So as a child, it could be possible to switch to another function preference. After all, your primary function is still developing. In your teens, it's a little less likely. 20 and beyond, I think the only way that could happen is if the individual was EXTREMELY undeveloped, underwent extreme stress, or was in some bizarre accident. And your preference for your dominant two functions would either have to decrease (Very unlikely, as it took your entire life to develop them), or they would stay the same, and relatively weak functions shot up in strength (And be used more positively than negatively). If that were to happen, that would be one badass individual. They'd be more balanced than most, which sounds questionable if the person went through a stressful incident or accident.

Now here's what might appear like a personality change: Your shadow functions coming out. These are functions 5-8. Unlike primary functions, they usually only show up in negative circumstances (or over a significant period of time as an individual balances out). Under extreme stress, you may live almost entirely in your shadow functions, primarily your more developed 5-6 functions. But they would very rarely be used in a healthy manner. Now for TheChosenOne, his fifth and sixth functions are Se and Ti, respectively. So under this period of stress, he looked nearly identical to an ESTP in his late teens. So yeah, of course he would test as an ESTP. Before this stress, he really only depended on his Si + Te. His relief function, or his 3rd function, was barely, if at all, developed. Therefore, once his first two functions were exhausted, he couldn't tap into that 3rd function like an ISTJ in his 30s or 40s could. Instead, he relied on his Opposing function and Critical Parent function (5 and 6... see link above :p).

Okay, anyways, in a way, it looked like a personality switch. So I guess if you really wanted to, you could say that he switched personalities for a year. But the fact that he appeared ISTJ again once his stress went away (or once he was able to energize his first two functions again), says that he was doing what any teen would do under extreme stress: Adapt.

Anyways, I'm done ranting now. I would like to add that my ENFP sister thinks I changed personality types when I was around 6-8. I have no idea what I could have been (or what function I was developing), but she says I cried near constantly as a very young kid. I honestly can't remember very much. And I don't know how many Ti dominant children were like that, so I guess she might be right. :shock: But about a year ago, I found a letter from my 6th grade English professor that she wrote to the class and talked about each student. She made note that "And Stephanie's willingness to try anything once." So around 11ish, that sounds more ISTPish :p
 

laughingebony

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
236
MBTI Type
INTP
I don't agree. Your function order typically leaves room open for multiple types.

There is no room for disagreement. By its very definition, "type" is determined by function order. If you are referring to a classification system in which the classifications are not based on function order, you are not talking about "type," at least not in the Jung/Myers/Briggs sense. Given that:

1. On this forum, when people talk about "type," they are usually referring to "type" in the Jung/Myers/Briggs sense.
2. The OP did not specify otherwise.

It is reasonable to assume that the OP was referring to "type" in the Jung/Myers/Briggs sense, unless (s)he hereafter specifies otherwise.
 

NewEra

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
3,104
MBTI Type
I
This calls for an analysis. My first reaction: I don't believe this. Then so what happened is that under stress a.o. you developed dominant Se, secondary Ti, where you first had dominant Si and secondary Te. Superficially, it looks like you changed orientation of your dominant S and secondary T. I suppose this could well be possible, since an SiTe will typically have fairly well developed SeTi. Another association: you might've temporarily shifted to an ISTJ's right brain double agents (see here).
Now, I guess it is possible that under stress a left brainer can shift to his right brain.
Since you say you were an ESP child, it could also be the other way around, that you shifted to an ESTP's left brain double agents (being SiTe).
But you consider yourself an ISTj now. I'm wondering if you're an ISTJ who used to be more 'social' (i mean, whatever that is) when you were young? It's hard to say, this is my take for now.

That's interesting, thanks for the analysis and link, although it's slightly confusing (with the left-brained ESTP and a right-brained ISTJ).
 

NewEra

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
3,104
MBTI Type
I
But completely altering your function order? Now your four primary functions develop throughout life. Keep in mind that as a child, your primary function is really the only one that's developing. So TheChosenOne, for example was primarily an Si child. I can imagine an Si child looking like an ESP, simply because they're craving data all the time. Especially when you're still developing preferences at this time... He was developing both Si and Se, but Si took role of his primary function, and Se as a shadow function to his Si. Next, in your teens, you develop your second function. Your third comes in roughly around your 20s, and your fourth comes in around 30ish or so.

So as a child, it could be possible to switch to another function preference. After all, your primary function is still developing. In your teens, it's a little less likely. 20 and beyond, I think the only way that could happen is if the individual was EXTREMELY undeveloped, underwent extreme stress, or was in some bizarre accident. And your preference for your dominant two functions would either have to decrease (Very unlikely, as it took your entire life to develop them), or they would stay the same, and relatively weak functions shot up in strength (And be used more positively than negatively). If that were to happen, that would be one badass individual. They'd be more balanced than most, which sounds questionable if the person went through a stressful incident or accident.

Now here's what might appear like a personality change: Your shadow functions coming out. These are functions 5-8. Unlike primary functions, they usually only show up in negative circumstances (or over a significant period of time as an individual balances out). Under extreme stress, you may live almost entirely in your shadow functions, primarily your more developed 5-6 functions. But they would very rarely be used in a healthy manner. Now for TheChosenOne, his fifth and sixth functions are Se and Ti, respectively. So under this period of stress, he looked nearly identical to an ESTP in his late teens. So yeah, of course he would test as an ESTP. Before this stress, he really only depended on his Si + Te. His relief function, or his 3rd function, was barely, if at all, developed. Therefore, once his first two functions were exhausted, he couldn't tap into that 3rd function like an ISTJ in his 30s or 40s could. Instead, he relied on his Opposing function and Critical Parent function (5 and 6... see link above :p).

Okay, anyways, in a way, it looked like a personality switch. So I guess if you really wanted to, you could say that he switched personalities for a year. But the fact that he appeared ISTJ again once his stress went away (or once he was able to energize his first two functions again), says that he was doing what any teen would do under extreme stress: Adapt.

That's very informative and enlightening, thank you. It would make sense that as a child, I didn't have my type fully ingrained or intact.

Also, you mention that the 3rd function is the relief function, the one you go to when the first two functions are spent. In most of the tests I've taken, I've had Si as almost always dominant, but the three after them are up for grabs. Usually I have Ti as my 2nd leading function, and either Te or Se as 3rd (the other is 4th). I have Fi as 5th too. So do you think that because I generally have Se as my 3rd or 4th function, that I tapped into this auxiliary or inferior function under stress (when my first two functions are not dependable) ?? Thanks.
 

StephMC

Controlled Mischief
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
1,044
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
That's interesting, thanks for the analysis and link, although it's slightly confusing (with the left-brained ESTP and a right-brained ISTJ).

Yeah, I haven't read too much about how MBTI relates to left brain or right brain... :huh: that's my next project. As for now, I really only know about how function order works
 

StephMC

Controlled Mischief
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
1,044
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
That's very informative and enlightening, thank you. It would make sense that as a child, I didn't have my type fully ingrained or intact.

Also, you mention that the 3rd function is the relief function, the one you go to when the first two functions are spent. In most of the tests I've taken, I've had Si as almost always dominant, but the three after them are up for grabs. Usually I have Ti as my 2nd leading function, and either Te or Se as 3rd (the other is 4th). I have Fi as 5th too. So do you think that because I generally have Se as my 3rd or 4th function, that I tapped into this auxiliary or inferior function under stress (when my first two functions are not dependable) ?? Thanks.

That can depend on a lot. A) Your age. B) How much stress you are under on a regular basis (and how well you deal with it). C) The people around... the list goes on. I would try taking a few different tests when you are in a very relaxed state, and haven't had much stress for a while. The typical ISTJ function order goes: Si Te Fi Ne | Se Ti Fe Ni.

Okay, so here goes my best stab at what I think is going on. If Si I is very dominant, and you are young (early 20s), typically Se is going to be its shadow function. If you have stress on a regular basis, Se is going to come out a lot, even if your dominant function isn't exhausted. But here's the thing, it usually comes out in more negative ways then positive. Here's a question, can you relate to this?: "They can become stubborn about going with the flow of a single impulse and insist they have an accurate read on a current situation. Yet the can be quite adept at seeing what is really there for what it is." This is what Se looks like as a fifth function. Ti as a 6th function appears as so: "They usually prefer not articulating operating principles and, when stressed, can become stuck in models and frameworks they have learned or adopted. Yet at times they can magically see how their models fit situations and problems they are dealing with."

Here's the thing, if you're in your early 20s, most likely you only have your 1st (Si) and 2nd (Te) functions developed, followed by your 5th (Se) and 6th (Ti) as shadow functions. However, your 3rd function peaks out occasionally. So if you've had a lot of stress in the recent years, or have been exposed to specific situations a lot, you will score high on Se and Ti. I think while you still depend primarily on Si, you're constantly exposed to things that bring out your 5th and 6th, primarily your Ti. Read the role of the Critical Parent again (6th function), from my link...
The critical parent role is how we find weak spots and can immobilize and demoralize others. We can also feel this way when others use the process that plays this role. It is often used sporadically and emerges more often under stressful conditions when something important is at risk. When we engage it, we can go on and on.

Are you put in situations like that often? And your Fi might be coming out as 5th because, well, you're developing that on the side and constantly engaging in you primary and shadow functions. Under stress, it's a struggle to juggle all of these, especially and crucial development ages. It's going to be confusing, and all over the place.

Now I said earlier that your function order isn't going to be -exactly- like your type. But in your "healthiest" state, and with minimal stress, it's going to be damn close, give or take a spot or two. But even then, if more than 1 or 2 functions switch a spot up or down, you could completely flop into an ESTJ . Again, if you've been testing under stress, Shadow Functions will pop up. Look closely at your Se and Ti... do you feel like you use them in a healthy manner? On that website, it gives pretty decent descriptions of those 8 cognitive processes. Do you use it the way they describe? Or do you use it when you're feeling oppositional or critical? Do you use it naturally on easy-going days? Does it strain you to use them? Do they fit up to the way function order describes (i.e. Ready "The Support Role"... Do you use your Ti in that manner?)? When you're -acting- into the world, what do you look like? More organized or more spontaneous? If your first function is Si, you need an extroverted second function to survive in the world. In this case, it's either Te or Se (but if you're an ISTJ, it's most likely Te).

I've rambled again. So to answer as simply as possible, if you're in your 20s, you're probably not going to depend on your 3rd or 4th function. It's still developing. If Se comes out at all, it probably is in the form of a shadow function.
 

laughingebony

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
236
MBTI Type
INTP
So as a child, it could be possible to switch to another function preference. After all, your primary function is still developing. In your teens, it's a little less likely. 20 and beyond, I think the only way that could happen is if the individual was EXTREMELY undeveloped, underwent extreme stress, or was in some bizarre accident. And your preference for your dominant two functions would either have to decrease (Very unlikely, as it took your entire life to develop them), or they would stay the same, and relatively weak functions shot up in strength (And be used more positively than negatively). If that were to happen, that would be one badass individual. They'd be more balanced than most, which sounds questionable if the person went through a stressful incident or accident.


Okay, I'll buy that. What you have established, though, is not that it is impossible, just that it is very unlikely and, in addition, have brought my disproof into question. I am trying to understand why other posters are saying that it can't happen, as though it is absolute, and without any plausible explanation. I'm a big fan of using qualifiers. (Is that characteristic of any function, in particular?)

StephMC939 said:
Long post in response to TheChosenOne

TheChosenOne: Perhaps if you determine your function order based on what role each function plays, rather than on its raw strength, what StephMC939 said will become a bit clearer. My own type became much clearer when I reordered my functions as such.
 

StephMC

Controlled Mischief
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
1,044
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
9w8
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Okay, I'll buy that. What you have established, though, is not that it is impossible, just that it is very unlikely and, in addition, have brought my disproof into question. I am trying to understand why other posters are saying that it can't happen, as though it is absolute, and without any plausible explanation. I'm a big fan of using qualifiers. (Is that characteristic of any function, in particular?)
Yeah, it's not impossible. After majoring in statistics, I kinda deleted the word "impossible" from my vocabulary... But it is highly unlikely. And there would have to be some prettyyyyy unusual circumstances at a relatively young age. Very doubtful 30 and beyond.


TheChosenOne: Perhaps if you determine your function order based on what role each function plays, rather than on its raw strength, what StephMC939 said will become a bit clearer. My own type became much clearer when I reordered my functions as such.
Hahah... sorry about that. I have a tendency to ramble about topics I'm really interested in (My Ti lets loose). Very well said, btw. For example, read the description of Ti on this site. Then read the function order again... does Ti look like a Supporting role? If not, which role -does- it look like?
 

NewEra

New member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
3,104
MBTI Type
I
That can depend on a lot. A) Your age. B) How much stress you are under on a regular basis (and how well you deal with it). C) The people around... the list goes on. I would try taking a few different tests when you are in a very relaxed state, and haven't had much stress for a while. The typical ISTJ function order goes: Si Te Fi Ne | Se Ti Fe Ni.

Okay, so here goes my best stab at what I think is going on. If Si I is very dominant, and you are young (early 20s), typically Se is going to be its shadow function. If you have stress on a regular basis, Se is going to come out a lot, even if your dominant function isn't exhausted. But here's the thing, it usually comes out in more negative ways then positive. Here's a question, can you relate to this?: "They can become stubborn about going with the flow of a single impulse and insist they have an accurate read on a current situation. Yet the can be quite adept at seeing what is really there for what it is." This is what Se looks like as a fifth function. Ti as a 6th function appears as so: "They usually prefer not articulating operating principles and, when stressed, can become stuck in models and frameworks they have learned or adopted. Yet at times they can magically see how their models fit situations and problems they are dealing with."

I can relate to the Se statement more, not as much with the Ti one.

Here's the thing, if you're in your early 20s, most likely you only have your 1st (Si) and 2nd (Te) functions developed, followed by your 5th (Se) and 6th (Ti) as shadow functions. However, your 3rd function peaks out occasionally. So if you've had a lot of stress in the recent years, or have been exposed to specific situations a lot, you will score high on Se and Ti. I think while you still depend primarily on Si, you're constantly exposed to things that bring out your 5th and 6th, primarily your Ti. Read the role of the Critical Parent again (6th function), from my link...

Are you put in situations like that often? And your Fi might be coming out as 5th because, well, you're developing that on the side and constantly engaging in you primary and shadow functions. Under stress, it's a struggle to juggle all of these, especially and crucial development ages. It's going to be confusing, and all over the place.

Now I said earlier that your function order isn't going to be -exactly- like your type. But in your "healthiest" state, and with minimal stress, it's going to be damn close, give or take a spot or two. But even then, if more than 1 or 2 functions switch a spot up or down, you could completely flop into an ESTJ . Again, if you've been testing under stress, Shadow Functions will pop up. Look closely at your Se and Ti... do you feel like you use them in a healthy manner? On that website, it gives pretty decent descriptions of those 8 cognitive processes. Do you use it the way they describe? Or do you use it when you're feeling oppositional or critical? Do you use it naturally on easy-going days? Does it strain you to use them? Do they fit up to the way function order describes (i.e. Ready "The Support Role"... Do you use your Ti in that manner?)? When you're -acting- into the world, what do you look like? More organized or more spontaneous? If your first function is Si, you need an extroverted second function to survive in the world. In this case, it's either Te or Se (but if you're an ISTJ, it's most likely Te).

Hmm... from your link I would say that I relate to Te the most in a healthy way, but also to Si and Se a little. Not really Ti. However, the use of all functions except Si and Te are straining.

Thanks again.

TheChosenOne: Perhaps if you determine your function order based on what role each function plays, rather than on its raw strength, what StephMC939 said will become a bit clearer. My own type became much clearer when I reordered my functions as such.

Yeah, I'll take a look at this, thanks.
 

Max

New member
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
471
MBTI Type
ISTP
As much as I understand, the type shows what people actually PREFER to use and I'm pretty sure this won't change (unless perhaps one already is borderline-something anyway). But it is possible to learn to handle the opposite functions and get quite comfortable at them. For example, I am extremely N, but I actually pay special attention to experience and grow S. So I could 'switch it on' when needed... But never mind how good I might get at S, I'm sure I'll always PREFER to use N by default. Something like that.
Actually, I would prefer to be extroverted, but am still introverted nonetheless because there is nothing I can do about it. I don't much enjoy being alone, and I am happier when I have friends with me, but I don't get that opportunity very often and when I do, I'm not very experienced at it.
Your type is often also visible in your basic appearance, and I don't guess that changes too much.

Interesting, because according to this test, I have the face of an ENFJ... which is not quite my type, haha... Not sure how accurate or professional that test really is, though.
 
Top