I'm asking about leadership for no particular reason that I recognise quite clearly. Just a collection of impressions: that Fe types do organise; that the purposes are unclear to me; and it seems often that overt statements of organisational goals are avoided.
It SEEMS there are no opt-out clauses. It SEEMS that Fe organisation is polarising. It SEEMS that one is in or one is out, and one pays a price if one is out. And that last idea SEEMS to suggest Fe organisation involves the use of a peculiar kind of force.
Just curious. And puzzled.
ETA: Also, maybe there's some idea that if Fe Leadership were understood better then Fe Fakeness would stand in some different light, maybe even disappear as a concept.