Thread: JCF Isn't The Answer
07-26-2011, 12:34 AM #61
07-26-2011, 03:23 PM #62GlycerineGuest
Typology is just for fun like astrology. Don't ruin it for all of us!
07-26-2011, 03:32 PM #63
Jag is a natural skeptic. He needs to be convinced, and needs to see the
evidence, and your logic needs to be sound. Beyond reproach, even. This can
be quite an undertaking, but once won over, Jag will be your staunchest
ally. Jag is phenomenally analytical, meticulous, and painstaking. Jag loves
the research process, is as relentless and tenacious as a bulldog and pretty
much won't stop until he is damn good and ready.
That quote was astrology.
07-26-2011, 04:13 PM #64GlycerineGuest
07-26-2011, 05:10 PM #65
It's rather silly, if you think about it, to rely on objective criteria when trying to understand what is fundamentally subjective.
07-26-2011, 05:11 PM #66"But you forget that there is one value that is greater than all others: human freedom. Because no matter how perfectly you set the world up for humanity, they will always rebel simply to exert their own selves. You cannot win."
07-27-2011, 12:07 AM #67
I don't feel attacked in the slightest . If you only wanted people on your "plonk list" to reply to a thread, then maybe a public forum was the wrong place to post it."Charlotte sometimes dreams a wall around herself. But it's always with love - So much love it looks like everything else. Charlotte Sometimes - So far away, glass sealed and pretty." - The Cure
INFP | 4w5 sp/sx - 451| RLUEI - Primary Inquisitive
07-27-2011, 12:45 AM #68
I thought that psychological types are just prisms and frameworks to help you examine yourself? I never thought they were my Answer. Has everyone else been building their entire identity around the good word of Keirsey?
Jung himself said that his types were for mere clinical usefulness. He didn't wave a magic wand and proclaim himself a prophet. He didn't even lecture on the types outside the basic introductory stuff, really. Jung didn't give very many shits about his system beyond that.
12-26-2015, 12:11 AM #69
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- LSI Se
12-26-2015, 12:56 PM #70
Toward a Diversity of Psychological Type in Organization
"In order to see the difficulty more clearly, look at the 'INFP'. By the rules of the MBTI game, the 'P' designation indicates that the letter in the third place ('F') identifies the individual's dominant function. The INFP, thus, is an 'introverted feeling type'. But the 'P' also tells us that the INFP is typically an individual who 'remains open', and is not interested in seeking 'closure' (as is the J). The question to ask here is, 'Is it legitimate to make all introverted feeling types with auxiliary iNtuition BY DEFINITION non-closure-seeking (P) types?' Cannot an introverted feeling type with auxiliary iNtuition not be a closure-seeking J? If so, how would we go about 'writing' the name of such a type? It cannot be done using the current MBTI nomenclature!""But you forget that there is one value that is greater than all others: human freedom. Because no matter how perfectly you set the world up for humanity, they will always rebel simply to exert their own selves. You cannot win."
By Saslou in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)Replies: 36Last Post: 01-27-2016, 06:30 PM
By BlackCat in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)Replies: 79Last Post: 01-28-2010, 05:06 PM
By cornflakegirl in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)Replies: 23Last Post: 10-22-2009, 07:12 PM
By Digital Demi-Fiend in forum The BonfireReplies: 37Last Post: 06-23-2009, 05:51 PM
By Rhu in forum Welcomes and IntroductionsReplies: 26Last Post: 04-23-2007, 10:33 PM