User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8

  1. #1
    Member darude11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    31

    Default Reinin dichotomies - True or False?

    http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...in_dichotomies

    If you want to, you can read futher that page.

    Is theory of Reinin dichotomies right or wrong? If yes, which dichotomies are right and which wrong? Which are believable and which not?

    Sorry if there is thread about this theme, but I had no time to search. Thanks for understanding!

  2. #2
    Honor Thy Inferior Such Irony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    INtp
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    5,091

    Default

    I'm socionics LII and I fit quite nicely into the all of the dichotomies listed for that type. Who would have thought?
    INtp
    5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
    Ravenclaw/Hufflepuff
    Neutral Good
    LII-Ne




  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    16

    Default

    don't get me wrong, ideas like these which can be nicely fit into some sort of conceptual framework are very interesting. But the first impression I get when i read a few lines from that page is that it must be some kind of a pseudoscience. A statement they made: "Whether they have empirical content, on the other hand, is a completely separate matter." is a sufficient reason for us to not believe in the claims they've made. But this is not to say that their ideas were all wrong, it is just that we dont have a good reason to believe they were true.

  4. #4
    ⒺⓉⒷ Eric B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    548 sp/sx
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    I remember the Reinin dichotomies in that two of them "Merry" and "Serious" correspond to Fe/Ti and Te/Fi, respectively.
    I had been looking for names to group types by tandem preference like that.

    Then (for the perception tandems), you also have the "Romance Styles":
    Se/Ni = "Aggressor/Victim"
    Ne/Si = "Caregiver/Infantile"
    APS Profile: Inclusion: e/w=1/6 (Supine) |Control: e/w=7/3 (Choleric) |Affection: e/w=1/9 (Supine)
    Ti 54.3 | Ne 47.3 | Si 37.8 | Fe 17.7 | Te 22.5 | Ni 13.4 | Se 18.9 | Fi 27.9

    Temperament (APS) from scratch -- MBTI Type from scratch
    Type Ideas

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Gosh, ENFPs are so narrow-minded and bigoted. They should be more open and accepting, like the ESFJs.

  6. #6
    Senior Member sulfit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    6w5 sp/so
    Posts
    492

    Default

    These are the ones that I think work:

    Static/Dynamic (which is same as J/P in MBTI where J=dynamic, P=static): http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=34994

    Merry/Serious (this one describes FiTe vs FeTi differences): http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ead.php?t=5026

    Tactical/Strategic: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=28666

    Positivist/Negativist: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=10295

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    TiNe
    Enneagram
    5
    Socionics
    LII
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Farsighted - Obstinate - Static - Democratic - Strategic - Constructivist - Negativist -Judicious - Serious - Result - Asking

    I find that Static/Dynamic - Tactical/Strategic - Positivist/Negativist and Asking/Demanding are a bit hard to tell when it comes to me, I feel sometimes in between. And no type fits but I think it would be either LII or ILI.
    Feel no shame for what you are...

    INTP
    5w4 or 5w6 sp/so

  8. #8
    Senior Member sulfit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    6w5 sp/so
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Positivist/Negativist can be difficult. Asking/Declaring is usually easy - does the person make a lot of declarative statements? do they ask you questions as a way of continuing conversation? In writing this one may be hard to tell, but asker will make greater use of rhetorical questions in what they write. Positivists will often dismiss parts of the argument that point out flaws in their reasoning and instead focus on parts where they can point of flaws in other people's reasoning. It can look as if they are cherry-picking. Negativists are more likely to address these parts because they are more interesting in mending the holes and correcting the errors.

Similar Threads

  1. Socionics Reinin Dichotomies Test
    By Legion in forum Online Personality Tests
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 11-30-2016, 02:43 AM
  2. True and False
    By Alea_iacta_est in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-19-2013, 11:47 PM
  3. Physics Question - True Or False?
    By Mal12345 in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-15-2013, 08:46 AM
  4. True or False?
    By Ginkgo in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-23-2009, 07:18 PM
  5. True or False?
    By Sunshine in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-10-2008, 09:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO