• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Which term should replace "user" when talking about cognitive functions?

Such Irony

Honor Thy Inferior
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
5,059
MBTI Type
INtp
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
People on this forum speak of terms like "Fi user", "Ti user", etc. I know they mean "user" to be those who don't have that function in their shadow. In other words its one of their top 4 functions. So Fi "users" are xxFP and xxTJ and Ti "users" are xxTP and xxFJ.

I don't like the term "user" because everybody uses every function. Sure there's a difference between those who have a function in their shadow and those who don't but it's still being used.

So I thought I'd ask the forum what term if any should replace the word "user"?

I was thinking of shadow vs. non-shadow.
 

IZthe411

Carerra Lu
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
2,585
MBTI Type
INTJ
I assume "user" as someone who has it in their dichotomy, like FPs. We all use them, but in the dominant context is how it's generally understood.
 

Andy

Supreme High Commander
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
1,211
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
The idea of using functions at all is a little conctroversal, as people don't deliberately express a given function for the most part. That said, the term used does make talking about things easier. I've got ino the habit of saying express instead, which sounds a little less premeditated.

I've also utilised the phrase "consciouse Fi user" to talk about someone with Fi in the first four functions. Actually, I don't like the term conciouse function either, once again because people aren't really aware of functions being expressed. Mostly though, it's all just semantics, and I refuse to get too bogged down in it. The concepts are what matter, regardless of what you callthem. It can create misunderstanding though.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,568
I propose "good guys" for NTJ users and "bad guys" or "evil" for other cognitive sets.
 
R

ReflecTcelfeR

Guest
Maybe we could speak about them as inclinations? For example "He was more inclined towards extraverted sensing than any other function.". It shows tendency and allows for a change in preference.
 

redacted

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
4,223
I don't see what's wrong with user. Someone calling someone else a "Ti user" is just a shortcut for saying that person is an FJ or a TP... 4 letters are easier to type than a more full explanation each time. Obviously people use all 8 functions (although I personally really think there are only four and preferred orientations for each), so people should just assume no one's saying otherwise.
 
Top