Please tell me no one is suggesting that a particular order of functions is unhealthy for people... It's not the behaviour manifest but why it's there which determines if it's healthy or not. Should I never burst into tears or suffer empathy out the whazzo for no particular reason? I think frickin not. If you CAN'T flex from your defined preferences, if they are the quoted 100% (not that I believe in the percentages stuff particularly) then THAT is a sign of being unhealthy/ under developed. And no I don't really care how much someone can claim to be 100% T, if they are then they're either disturbed or just plain thick.
I would agree that function order tells you the order of preferences of an individual and I'd guess that any model presented which said that this format is correct is born out of ignorance not insight.
Still, I guess, as research has shown stress to be a potential killer then yes it would deserve the title of "unhealthy". Mind you it's all shades of grey. Consider sea green or turquoise. One guy calls it blue, the other green.
Oh and she's only not got slapped thus far because her other half is popular and would get it in the neck for years afterwards. That and the girl is pitiful. You could call us enablers... it does fit. In fact my wife has given me ear ache over being too reasonable with this girl.