User Tag List

12 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 13

  1. #1
    Senior Member Blackwater's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    MBTI
    ERTP
    Posts
    454

    Default An INFJ Reviews the Book: 'The Introvert Advantage'

    An INFJ has written a short review of the popular self-help book, The Introvert Advantage. The book deals primarily with E/I, but also touches upon MBTI.

    Read it here: http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2...vert-advantage
    best collection of philosopher typings online

    http://www.celebritytypes.com/philosophers/

  2. #2
    Administrator highlander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/sp
    Socionics
    ILI Ni
    Posts
    17,906

    Default

    I liked that book.

    Please provide feedback on my Nohari and Johari Window by clicking here: Nohari/Johari

    Tri-type 639

  3. #3
    can't handcuff the wind Z Buck McFate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    3,689

    Default

    It’s been several years since I’ve read Introvert’s Advantage, but a few of the points of criticism seem a bit off. I’m catching a whiff of Pi. The writer is doing something which reminds me of something I do myself, and I only realize that tunnel-vision was affecting my perspective in retrospect. Something will seem ‘clearly’ more or less true because of some precept I’ve already got in my head, and I’ll only be able to see how short-sighted it is later on (i.e. shortsighted in that I won’t recognize how the external reality was something slightly different than what was going on in my head, that the precept didn’t exactly match the external reality as well as I was thinking it did at the time). Overall, it seems to me like the reviewer is primed (as a neurobiologist) to listen to certain ‘scientific’ information- as if a very specific criteria for ‘scientific’ has been constructed in this person’s head, and they're automatically dismissing information that doesn’t easily fit into the template they’ve constructed. Like I said, it’s been years since I’ve read the book, but I seem to remember it being more helpful in the way of explaining ‘introverted’ than this reviewer is making it out to be.
    Reality is a collective hunch. -Lily Tomlin

    5w4 sx/sp Johari / Nohari

  4. #4
    Senior Member Blackwater's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    MBTI
    ERTP
    Posts
    454

    Default

    I think thats an interesting criticism

    But what is 'Pi' ?
    best collection of philosopher typings online

    http://www.celebritytypes.com/philosophers/

  5. #5
    Senior Member Mephistopheles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    6w5
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackwater View Post
    I think thats an interesting criticism

    But what is 'Pi' ?
    I think introverted perception is meant.
    They say I only think in form of crunching numbers.....
    -Fall Out Boy

  6. #6
    can't handcuff the wind Z Buck McFate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    3,689

    Default

    Perception being directed maybe too far inward, focusing on the preconstructed template far more than external reality (or rather, mistaking fragments of the preconstructed template for fragments of external reality).

    Of course, it’s possible that I’m the one who’s doing it, and the reviewer isn’t doing it at all. It just seems to me, though, that when someone exaggerates a point (the way this reviewer, imo, is exaggerating the lack of worth in this book’s description of ‘introvert’) to the extent they appear somewhat short-sighted, it’s more because of some issue within the person more than it is because of some issue with whatever/whoever they are criticizing. I just know that personally, in reading it, I got the impression that person is trying to resolve their own issues between that divide between proper ‘science’ and psychology- and their own issues interfered a bit with their review, with the ability to take in what’s really there and evaluate it’s worth effectively (some baby fragments got thrown out with the bathwater). It’s almost embarrassingly clear in IxxJs when this is happening (which I suspect is Pi-dom related).

    [edit:] Even if it weren't mentioned that the reviewer is INFJ, I'd still think there was some of this going on (I wouldn't even presume the reviewer was any specific type, I'd just think this was going on). It embarrasses me a little to see it going on in other people because it really embarrasses me when I notice I'll have been doing it myself.
    Reality is a collective hunch. -Lily Tomlin

    5w4 sx/sp Johari / Nohari

  7. #7
    can't handcuff the wind Z Buck McFate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    3,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mephistopheles View Post
    I think introverted perception is meant.

    Right, yeah, sorry. This^.
    Reality is a collective hunch. -Lily Tomlin

    5w4 sx/sp Johari / Nohari

  8. #8
    Sniffles
    Guest

    Default

    I thought it was a decent book personally for its intended purposes.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Blackwater's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    MBTI
    ERTP
    Posts
    454

    Default

    oh I agree with you, Z Buck McFate, the reviewer is very much in her own head most of the time. she's a great scientist but sometimes too inside her own head when dealing with people.
    best collection of philosopher typings online

    http://www.celebritytypes.com/philosophers/

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Posts
    136

    Default

    I think what the reviewer is doing is commonly referred to as "having another axe to grind". I don't think she was being fair either to the author or the reader. The scientific studies referred in the book are very illuminating and this is the best part of the book, although I think Lainey said it was part of a graduate thesis of some sort -- which shows, because the rest of the book is pretty disappointing. It doesn't indicate any advantage in being introverted, but instead points out all the disadvantages and supplies handy tips on how to meet people, date, get jobs, go to parties, raise kids, etc. The tips were all fairly elementary and aimed toward getting introverts to act more like extroverts than focusing on introverts' strengths. Something like MBTI would have been very helpful at this point, discussing different types' naturally extroverted function -- that works better for me than trying to pretend I'm an extrovert (seriously, I've tried it, and it's disastrous).

Similar Threads

  1. [INFJ] Presentation: In the Mind/Brain of an INFJ
    By MrRandom in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-06-2013, 07:43 PM
  2. [INFJ] Being an INFJ, I must have the family from hell?
    By John101 in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-11-2011, 08:34 PM
  3. [INFJ] The MMDI scores me as an INFJ!
    By Nameless Hero in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 01:53 AM
  4. [INFJ] To Other Types: How does it feel when an INFJ gives you the (super) cold shoulder?
    By fill in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-03-2009, 06:23 AM
  5. [INFJ] When an INFJ is past the point of caring...
    By Immaculate Cloud in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 11:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO