User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3

  1. #1

    Default The chicken or the egg?

    Which came first: MBTI/Jungian functions or the theory of MBTI/Jungian functions?

    I guess I could elaborate with, "the general pattern seems to go that as people learn more about MBTI, the more faith they put in it and the more it reinforces itself in their minds and behavioural patterns, thus reinforcing their faith in the theory and its 'accuracy.'

    So which came first: the theory that gave birth to these functions as an idea that people follow behaviourally (consciously or unconsciously), or the functions that hatched the theory because they actually exist to be systematically explained?"

    If it is, indeed, the latter, then does anyone have any idea how we evolved to have the functions Jung claimed we have? I'm not talking about how each function helps us evolutionarily, but how it is we evolved into having certain behavioural traits that can be explained, simply, by a set of - what is it - 8 functions and their combinations?

    Just a little speculation. Curious about what other people think...

  2. #2
    Senior Member Cybin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    MBTI
    INFP
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I think the Jungian functions are on a vein of real patterns in human cognition. I do not think they are a perfect or complete explanation, but I also do not think people act out the functions because of the theory. The basic attributes of the Jungian functions also permeate other archetypal views of human personalities, and also confirmed some of my own suspicions about my interaction with people before I knew of any personality matrix beyond astrology (which I never cared enough to read in to). I would love to find a neurological basis for the types and functions. I think that would be pretty exciting, and I don't think too far from a possibility.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Mephistopheles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    6w5
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Only read the title, but I just love scrambled eggs, so -> egg!

    Seriously, I agree with Cybin. I barely speak with other people about MBTI, usually only to let them confirm the type I assigned to them(either by giving them directly a text about that type or by giving them a test). Still, they mostly act like MBTI would predict.
    They say I only think in form of crunching numbers.....
    -Fall Out Boy

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-11-2013, 07:48 PM
  2. The chicken (T) and the egg (F)
    By Grayscale in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-29-2009, 07:17 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-24-2007, 07:35 AM
  4. The Human Mind - the sum of its parts or something more?
    By Geoff in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-15-2007, 06:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO