WHY DO YOU DRIVE ME BONKERS?!!?!?!?An e function contains no depth because there's some i function standing by, and likewise an i has no wider outreach than what can be provided by some e hanging around? The e will mirror and the i will tunnel into a hole? You HAVE to have more than one function to be a person? Or is there some accidental depth to every e and some incidental breadth to every i? A little bit of Fi in every Fe, a smidge of Ne in every Ni, a dollop of Xe leavening every Xi and some stain of Xi in the Xe? Or what?
We are human beings, and moreso, we are human beings who are frequenting a site on Typology, OF COURSE EVERY EXTROVERT WHO FREQUENTS THIS SITE HAS SOME DEPTH, (well, maybe not all, but certainly most), also, this site is dominated by Ns.
NPs and INJs to be exact, of course there are others, but I believe we make up the majority here, hence most of the posters will be Ne+T/Fi, or Ni+ T/Fe, T/Fi + Ne, or T/Fe + Ni
I will say this, many of the frequent posters display depth, although, "breadth" the way I think you are defining it, errrr, I fear that many of the frequenters here are, um, hmm, lacking in this department.
Which is okay, I like freaks.
Also, I agree with what Orobas said, Ne is not a depthless function, GIVE ME A BREAK!
Ne inevitably leads to...
New Neural Networks
Nebulous nectars offer kernels of truth.
Infinitrees abound with branches up and down connecting everything.
Not to seek, but to see beneath the surface, to find patterns, and commonalities, to find something hidden yet so apparent.
Ne will always want more information, will always get excited by the concept of finding something NeW!