User Tag List

First 5131415161725 Last

Results 141 to 150 of 320

  1. #141

    Default

    Oh, AWESOME. Yes indeed, all F's are go-with-the flow who are skeptical of nothing.
    I never said all F's are skeptical of "nothing". Usually when a person quotes somebody and inserts a hyperbole ( in this case the word "nothing") they are doing it for a negative effect. Obviously, everyone is skeptical to some degree, that is essential to human survival. However, I am not a novice and have had many discussions with "T" types and they are unusually argumentative. NOTICE: Don't say that I said that all T types want to do is argue. T types seem to be more interested in a victory for their self esteem and will argue trivial points. F types will let things slide or just determine it isn't worth the hassle.


    This post has made my day. And the ecto figures are basically what I said in my first post, whichyou dismissed because I couldn't *possibly* have these figures and yetbe INFJ at the same time.
    I still believe you are an INTJ or some other ectomorphic thinking type. I assumed that an F would be more endomorphic and I was giving the benefit of the doubt to your claim to being INFJ. So why do you bring that issue up? Because for a T it was some kind of victory for your self-overating.

    And then you ramble on just short of a rant about people giving credence to "this theory". Your next point is "obviously" an attempt to categorize any success of somatotyping as an illustration of the Forer effect. I think the MBTI has more of a problem with that than somatotyping as I practice it.

    Now, I am going to give you some advice that you need to talk to a therapist about. You take great photographs. You still have the privilege of posting a link to your photos and I clicked on that link. 120 plus pages (18 photos per page makes it close to 2000 photos.) I looked at them all. You left something out of those photos that is very important to Feeling types? Can you figure out what that something is? Would you mind telling me?

    Your lowest system is the visceral system. You are:

    Nervous-Orientational-Muscular-Visceral

    Feeling/Visceral is your inferior (shadow) function. And you will have a much happier life when you face that fact.
    “Sheldon considers human beings as they really are - psycho-physical wholes.”

    “the first serious advance of the science of man since Aristotle”

    “For the first time the old insights and intuitions about the different kinds of human beings have been clarified and put on a firmly objective and measurable basis.”
    ___“Aldous Huxley/ A Biography” Sybille Bedford, 1974

  2. #142
    Don't Judge Me! Haphazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    MBTI
    ENFJ
    Posts
    6,707

    Default

    Why do people make so much money on telling endomorphs that they're going to die?
    -Carefully taking sips from the Fire Hose of Knowledge

  3. #143
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,420

    Default

    Oh, the Adman returneth to insult a member who dared to question his little pet theory.
    What's the deal - ENFPforum blew off your thread, so you are looking for an audience at TypeC?

  4. #144
    4x9 cascadeco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Enneagram
    4 so/sp
    Posts
    6,931

    Default

    Eh..if you knew anything of my posting history, or actual *life*, outside of the posts in this specific thread, you would know that I am not argumentative and am conflict avoidant/preventative. I will, in certain instances however, speak my mind when it seems necessary. So, re. Somatotyping, I'm simply disagreeing with you, and yes, questioning the entire thing. But I don't have any more to say on the subject. You're not going to convince me of it, I have the right to disagree with you, and you have the right to propose your theories. However you obviously cannot expect everyone to believe your system - there will be disagreement (and for the record, I disagree with many elements of type theory, or at the very least how it is applied, as well). You and others are also free to consider me whatever type you think I am, and I'm free to disagree with your assessment.

    You can debate my actual type all you'd like -- keeping somatotyping completely out of the picture. There are threads galore in the What's My Type section where that is done, and it's no secret I've questioned my type in the past. I even have one in there from a few yrs back. However, you're not going to convince me of anything using somatotypic arguments, nor by picking out isolated aspects of my persona (i.e. photography) and using isolated pieces to justify a particular type.

    I won't be responding in this thread again.
    "...On and on and on and on he strode, far out over the sands, singing wildly to the sea, crying to greet the advent of the life that had cried to him." - James Joyce

    My Photography and Watercolor Fine Art Prints!!! Cascade Colors Fine Art Prints
    https://docs.google.com/uc?export=do...Gd5N3NZZE52QjQ

  5. #145
    Senior Member Tiltyred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    468 sx/sp
    Socionics
    EII None
    Posts
    4,383

    Default

    I don't want to participate, but I would like to see more examples if people are willing to have Psychdigg analyze them, and hear more about the theory.

  6. #146
    insert random title here Randomnity's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Enneagram
    6w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,489

    Default

    this thread is hilarious. 5 stars!

    lol at the "where are all the scientists? "
    -end of thread-

  7. #147
    Senior Member Tiltyred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    468 sx/sp
    Socionics
    EII None
    Posts
    4,383

    Default

    Where are all the open minds?

  8. #148
    Don't Judge Me! Haphazard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    MBTI
    ENFJ
    Posts
    6,707

    Default

    I'm unable to give a picture, but I can give you this:

    Female
    5'4"
    155 lbs
    41-31-43

    I neither lose nor gain weight easily.
    -Carefully taking sips from the Fire Hose of Knowledge

  9. #149
    garbage
    Guest

    Default

    If you've come up with different definitions of types, temperaments, dichotomies, and functions, of course your theory will match those types. If you define sensing as being more mesomorphic, for example.. then, well, of course mesomorphs will be considered sensing types in your system.

    At the end of the day, then, you and anyone who studies this system will simply have to ask--is it more useful than other typology systems that are out there?

    There might be some useful information in this theory. But that is, unfortunately, overshadowed by complete self-aggrandizement in how you've presented the theory here.

    Edit: found one of the websites in this thread, which answered some questions; also, focusing more on the main point in my post

  10. #150

    Default

    Cascadeco:

    Nice! Declaration of independence. Thinking once again rules the day. Feeling is about dependence. Thinking is about building walls and emphasizing boundaries. Come on. When you say I'm free to do whatever I want AND you're free to do whatever you want you are stating what everyone knows. So pull up the drawbridge and flood the moat.

    I am pleased to see resistance. Even though I'm not your therapist a therapist knows that when resistance starts showing that's a sign therapy is taking place. And when there is little or no resistance the outcome is poor. If you really believe you are what you are there shouldn't be so much concern as you have expressed.


    About the pictures. Of the over 2,000 posted pictures where are the pictures of people. I counted three close-ups of some elderly peasant types. And there are three or four close-ups of you that seem to arise mysteriously amid rows and rows of naturescapes devoid of people. A feeling person probably wouldn't make that mistake. Of course you may have another site that is flooded with pictures of the people that were unique to the particular areas you were visiting.

    One more thing.

    Would all the people who paid me for my services please raise their hands?
    “Sheldon considers human beings as they really are - psycho-physical wholes.”

    “the first serious advance of the science of man since Aristotle”

    “For the first time the old insights and intuitions about the different kinds of human beings have been clarified and put on a firmly objective and measurable basis.”
    ___“Aldous Huxley/ A Biography” Sybille Bedford, 1974

Similar Threads

  1. Type and personal space
    By Infinite Bubble in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 01-17-2013, 03:22 PM
  2. Personality Types and Music
    By SuperServal in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 06:37 PM
  3. Body language and personality type?
    By curiousel in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-24-2011, 08:32 AM
  4. Somatic Types and Personality Types
    By Mole in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-17-2009, 05:15 AM
  5. Personality Type and Growth
    By heart in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 05:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO