User Tag List

12311 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 196

Thread: Catch-22

  1. #1
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default Catch-22

    When we divide the agent do we divide the object?
    Let's have a catch of 22.

    Say 9 X 3 = 27
    > 9 X 8 = T(27)
    on account of (22/2) - 8 = 3

    9 X 4 = 36
    11 - 4 = 7
    9 X 7 = T(9 X 4)
    9 X 5 = T(9 X 6)
    9 X 2 = T(9 X 9)

    22 = T(22)
    22/2 = 11 = T(11)
    we need 100 - 1

    Back to 9 X 3
    = 27
    > 99 X 3 = 297
    on account of 11 - 3 = 8
    hence 99 X 8 = T(99 X 3)

    >9 X 4 = 36
    99 X 4 = 396
    11 - 4 = 7
    >99 X 7 =T(99 X 4)
    9 X 5 = 45
    >99 X 5 = 495
    11 - 5 = 6
    99 X 6 = T(99 X 5)
    2 + 9 = 11
    >99 X 2 = T(99 X 9).

    - 22 + (22/2) = - 11 etc .. :

    - 22
    - 11
    x00
    +11
    +22
    +33
    +44
    +55
    +66
    +77
    +88
    +99
    110
    121

    14/2 = 7
    99 X 7 = 693
    T(693) = 396

    we need an U-turn.

  2. #2
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    - 1 + 100
    (100 - 1) + 22 = 121

    Differentiate X = T(X)

    121 = (21 + 19 + 17 + 15 + 13 + 11 + 09 + 07 + 05 + 03 + 01 + 0)

    the U-turn:

    121 - 0
    100 -1
    81 - 4
    64 - 9
    49 - 16
    36 - 25

    99 X 7 = T(451 - 55)

    check
    100 = (19 + 17 + 15 + 13 + 11 + 9 + 7 + 5 + 3 + 1)

    100 - 1
    081 - 4
    064 - 9
    036 - 25

    330 - 55 = 275 = 55 X 5:

    99
    77
    55
    33
    11

    (T1 X 55) + 22
    = T(275)

  3. #3
    not to be trusted miss fortune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Enneagram
    827 sp/so
    Posts
    20,122

    Default

    so this goes back to the question of "is the whole a thing unto itself or a composite of it's parts?"
    “Oh, we're always alright. You remember that. We happen to other people.” -Terry Pratchett

  4. #4
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    Exactly. One is all we ever had. It is all there.

  5. #5
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    The question of whatever reminds me of our earlier discussion of the interelationship of 100 and 36. In view of the dichotomy above, another lesson in basicness.

    100 = T(5) X 2 =
    (19 + 17) + (15 + 13 + 11 + 9 + 7 + 5 + 3) + 1
    =
    +19
    +17
    +15
    +13
    +11
    +09
    +07
    +05
    +03
    +01

    = the dichotomy of T(2) X 5

    The d. of 36 = 19 + 17
    The d. of T(36) = 15 + 13 + 11 + 9 + 7 + 5 + 3

    T(1) = 10

    100 - 36 = T(36) + 1

  6. #6
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    Apropos we define the axiom:

    100 = the number in loci.

    When we illustrated the function order, the axioms were there but we did not define them.
    What was the number of the loci we needed to illustrate the function order?
    As I recall 16 X 4 = 64 = 2(32) = 8 X 8

    32 was the number of loci for function order. We doubled the number for the reason to illustrate the interchange. The key number was 9.
    9 X 4 = 36
    8 X 4 = 36 - 4 = 32

    Number in loci for the interplay of axioms =
    100 = 64 + 32 + 4

    Number of loci = 36 - 22/2 = 100/4 = 24 + 1

    100
    25

    4
    1

    Function is an eight-game. Four in the middle.
    4 + 4 = 8
    4 - 4 = 0

    We have differentiated the number in loci and the number of loci.

    36 - 22/2 = 5 X 5 = (8 + 8) + 8 + 1

    Definition:
    The number of loci for the axioms is eight: ESTJINFP
    The number of loci for the complementary axioms corresponds the number of the functions.

    That is eight axioms require eight complementary axioms and again eight loci for the interplay of the axioms and one for equilibrium.

  7. #7
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    The functions are complementary units. In other words, interplay is interchange.
    Therefore the functions take the place of the complementary axioms in the loci.

    The Axioms

    E
    I
    P
    J

    NSTF

    Axiom (A)
    Complementary Axiom (C)
    Eqilibrium (E)

    ACACA
    C000C
    A0E0A
    C000C
    ACACA

    Number of loci: 25
    Number in loci: 100

    1 X 25 = 25
    4 X 25 = 100

    4 - 0 = 5 - 1 = 6 - 2 = 7 - 3 = 8 - 4

    0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 64
    64/4 = 16

    2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 = 64/2
    32/4 = 8

    + E
    = 1 X 1
    1 X 4
    respectively.

  8. #8
    Yeah, I can fly. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    MBTI
    ENTJ
    Enneagram
    7w6 sx/sp
    Socionics
    ILE Ti
    Posts
    3,644

    Default

    Wildcat, no offense but you need to start expressing yourself in complete sentences. I can never understand shit of what's going on in your posts.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Teacher (Idyllic), ESE-IEI (Si-ESFj), SLue|I|, Sanguine-Melancholy
    Sage, True Neutral (Chaotic Good), Type III Anti-Hero
    Inventive > Artistic > Leisurely > Dramatic
    7w6 > 4w3 > 9w8, weakside sp/so

    Dark Worker (Sacrificing)
    Freewheeling Designer

    Hayekian Asshole


  9. #9
    Senior Member wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    3,619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aleksei View Post
    Wildcat, no offense but you need to start expressing yourself in complete sentences. I can never understand shit of what's going on in your posts.
    Complete sentences? What it is?
    I played truant every time we had grammar at school.
    I try free association.

    One hundred is the figurelein here.

    44444
    44444
    44444
    44444
    44444

    How many fours do you see?
    Five and twenty.

    Five-and-twenty times four makes a hundred.

    Think fourwise.

    36/4 = 9
    36 - 4 = 32
    32/4 = 8

    Axiom

    8 - 2 = 6
    8 - 6 = 2
    8 - 8 = 0
    8 - 0 = 8

    Complementary Axiom

    8 - 7 = 1
    8 - 1 = 7
    8 - 5 = 3
    8 - 3 = 5

    ATTENTION

    (8 - 0):2
    = 4

    ATTENTION

    ACACA
    C000C
    A0E0A
    C000C
    ACACA

  10. #10
    Ginkgo
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wildcat View Post
    The functions are complementary units. In other words, interplay is interchange.
    Therefore the functions take the place of the complementary axioms in the loci.

    The Axioms

    E
    I
    P
    J

    NSTF

    Axiom (A)
    Complementary Axiom (C)
    Eqilibrium (E)

    ACACA
    C000C
    A0E0A
    C000C
    ACACA

    Number of loci: 25
    Number in loci: 100

    1 X 25 = 25
    4 X 25 = 100

    4 - 0 = 5 - 1 = 6 - 2 = 7 - 3 = 8 - 4

    0 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 64
    64/4 = 16

    2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 = 64/2
    32/4 = 8

    + E
    = 1 X 1
    1 X 4
    respectively.
    Is this what they mean when they say that MBTI is a personality Matrix? A system composed of complementary parts that abide by functions?

Similar Threads

  1. Joseph Hellers Catch 22
    By Will2911 in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-28-2010, 10:21 AM
  2. What threads catches your eye?
    By UnitOfPopulation in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-16-2009, 09:48 AM
  3. Did anyone catch Obama's speech on race?
    By JuilinThiefTaker in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 09:23 AM
  4. Bond 22 title announced...
    By The Ü™ in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-12-2008, 12:49 AM
  5. Who invented catch? Dog or human?
    By Mort Belfry in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-20-2008, 11:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO