• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Catch-22

Night

Boring old fossil
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
4,755
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5/8
You should post more, Wildcat.

You're one of the most intelligent people I've ever encountered. It's unfortunate that other people don't take the time to decipher.


Reading isn't learning. Learning isn't comprehension. Different articles.
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
You should post more, Wildcat.

You're one of the most intelligent people I've ever encountered. It's unfortunate that other people don't take the time to decipher.


Reading isn't learning. Learning isn't comprehension. Different articles.
Thank you, Night. Good to see you. :)
People are busy. Midsummer and holidays. :smile:

It is interesting, though. The dichotomy of a hundred and 36 interlinked.
When we look at one side we may not immediately see the other side.
18 - 18 = 0

It is about the lowest common denominator really, between the neighbouring primary axioms:

43210
54321
65432
54321
43210

fourwise.

10 + 15 + 20 + 15 + 10
4 + 9 + 14 + 19 + 24 back in the five

10 - 4 = 15 - 9 = 20 - 14

6 + 6 + 6 = 18

15 - 19
10 - 24
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Preference is not about how much; quantity is. Preference is qualification. The lowest common denominator. MBTI.
In a play of cards you pick and choose in order of preference.

In Italy they use wind-doors to shut the wind-ows. The blind has the reverse side: The quantity. The numbers are in the pack.

THE DICHOTOMY OF D

D = - B

Quantification and qualification. A double two-set of a table.

XXXXX
XXXXX
00O00
00O00
00O00

00000
X0000
XX000
X0000
00000

or

XX000
XX000
XX000
XX000
XX000

0XXX0
00X00
00000
00000
00000

You have established a wave contour XXX .. > .

Turn a table of D clockwise. You have a table of A:

0XXX0
00X00
00000
00000
00000

000XX
000XX
000XX
000XX
000XX

Lay now the other A upside down:

00O00
00O00
00O00
XXXXX
XXXXX

00000
0000X
000XX
0000X
00000

You had B

Turn the B as you turn the page of a book:

00O00
00O00
00O00
XXXXX
XXXXX

00000
X0000
XX000
X0000
00000

You had C.

Interchange between the disposition of each.
Differentiate the number in the pack.
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Expansion of and in the loci.

100 = 36 + T(36) + 1

36/4
36 - 4

9 = T(1) - 1 = 32 - T(32)

4 X 9
9 X 2

T(492)?
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
36/4 c. 100 - 1

we had 9 = 32 - T(32)
99 = 392 - T(392)

T(492) = T(392) + 1

99 - 22 = 77

T(1)
+ 36/2

(36/2) +
(T)1 =
 
Last edited:

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
adding more dimensions now, I see :)

I suppose that math is the best way of expressing the multi-dimensional in a two dimensional form... pictures are often inadequate for doing so... but where does personality movement come in? the real confusion for others is usually that once they've looked at all of the facets they change again... nobody will ever constantly be the same 2 times, just as no two people are exactly the same... though it's right to use something like numbers to capture a variation that complete :)

sorry, it was the math classes that I skipped out on! :cheese:
 

matmos

Active member
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
1,714
MBTI Type
NICE
Catch-22?

Or Catch-21. ;)

Wonderful as always, wildcat - illuminating and perceptive.

The problem with the world is that it is not flat: this would solve the cartographer's problems. The mapmaker solves his problems by creating cones, cylinders and planes. One standard parallel, two standard parallels.

And in so doing creates a new set of problems.

Remember There Was An Old Woman?
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
adding more dimensions now, I see :)

I suppose that math is the best way of expressing the multi-dimensional in a two dimensional form... pictures are often inadequate for doing so... but where does personality movement come in? the real confusion for others is usually that once they've looked at all of the facets they change again... nobody will ever constantly be the same 2 times, just as no two people are exactly the same... though it's right to use something like numbers to capture a variation that complete :)

sorry, it was the math classes that I skipped out on! :cheese:
Exactly. A good comment.
We are bound by flatness. A problem is turned to an advantage.

The contours of the personality movement are there already. We have not reached the limit of the two dimentional facet yet.

It is good you skipped the math classes!
What an exquisite bore. I skipped them, too. :)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Catch-22?

Or Catch-21. ;)

Wonderful as always, wildcat - illuminating and perceptive.

The problem with the world is that it is not flat: this would solve the cartographer's problems. The mapmaker solves his problems by creating cones, cylinders and planes. One standard parallel, two standard parallels.

And in so doing creates a new set of problems.

Remember There Was An Old Woman?
True.

There is no way to tract it.
We are the problem. The object is all right. :)
 

lastrailway

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
508
What if, instead of dividing, you multiply?

Ie:

22/2 = 11
22*11 = 242
T(242) = 242
T(X) = X
T = X

(which of course happens with all multiples of 11).

242-11 = 231
231/11=21
Since we first used 2 and 11:
(T(231)/2)/11 = 6
Or ((T(231))*2)+11=23

So it can be anything from Catch-21 to Catch-23.
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
What if, instead of dividing, you multiply?

Ie:

22/2 = 11
22*11 = 242
T(242) = 242
T(X) = X
T = X

(which of course happens with all multiples of 11).

242-11 = 231
231/11=21
Since we first used 2 and 11:
(T(231)/2)/11 = 6
Or ((T(231))*2)+11=23

So it can be anything from Catch-21 to Catch-23.
Thank you, lastrailway!

I say very interesting. A good point. I shall be back. :)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Essential numbers, lastrailway! A good concept.

100 - 23 = 77
11 - (1 X 1) = 0 + 10

00 10 18 24 28 30 30 28 24 18 10 00
10 08 06 04 02 00 -2 etc

(30 - 2) + X
= (100 - 23)
 

lastrailway

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
508
With X being ((100-23)/11)^2?

You could go with prime numbers.
22-1=21
22-2=20
22-3=19
22-5=17
22-7=15
22-11=11
22-13=9
22-17=5
22-19=3

21,20,19,17,15,11,9,5,3
SUM = 120

(120-22)/7=14

14, 24, 32, 38, 42, 44, 44, 42, 38, 32, 24, 14

44-14=30

(30-2)+X= (100-23)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
With X being ((100-23)/11)^2?

You could go with prime numbers.
22-1=21
22-2=20
22-3=19
22-5=17
22-7=15
22-11=11
22-13=9
22-17=5
22-19=3

21,20,19,17,15,11,9,5,3
SUM = 120

(120-22)/7=14

14, 24, 32, 38, 42, 44, 44, 42, 38, 32, 24, 14

44-14=30

(30-2)+X= (100-23)
Yes. A perfect match.
Beautiful work, lastrailway, as always.
X is in the locker. :)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Victor labelled a thread: Typology without MBTI.
A valid proposition? Let us look into the matter.

The medial number of the function order = 9/2 = 4,5
but we are advised to remove the mark:

T(9)/2 = 45

Eysenck was a statistician. Statistics is a one-set.
Extravert - Introvert. Two types.
He never removed beyond the one-set. Not even when he added another set:
Stable - Unstable.
He was not wrong. Only circumscribed. And thereby useful.
However:

Extravert-Introvert: A one-set. Two types.
Add Stable-Unstable: A two-set. Four types.
Add Emotive-Non-Emotive: A three-set. Eight types.
MBTI: A four-set. 16 types.

T(9) = 90
T(9)/2 = T(38) - 38 = 45

T(9 X 9) = T(24) - 24 = 64 - T(64)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
I try to illustrate.

Say we have loci 1 X 1
Number in loci = 0(1 X 1)

We have number of loci 2 X 2
Number in loci = 1(2 X 2)

Number of loci = 3 X 3
Number in loci = 2(3 x 3)

Number of loci = 4 X 4
Number in loci: 3(4 X 4)

Number of loci = 5 X 5 (this one we had).
Number in loci = 4(5 x 5)

Number of loci = 6 X 6
Number in loci = 5(6 X 6)

Number of loci = 7 X 7
Number in loci = 6(7 X 7)
= T(492)
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
Let us recede to zero. In loci.

0(1 X 1) = 0

1(2 X 2) in loci:

00
11

+

01
01

2(3 X 3) in loci:

010
121
232

+

002
002
002

3(4 X 4) in loci = (+ inclusion of T(1):

0110
1221
2332
3443

+

0013
0013
0013
0013
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
4(5 X 5) = T(1) + T(2) + T(3) + T(4)

1 = 9 - 8
2 = 9 - 7
3 = 9 - 6
4 = 9 - 5 U turn:

1234
8765 U turn:

1234
2345

T(1) = (1 X 8) + (2 X 1)

T(2) = (2 x 7) + (3 X 2)

T(3) = (3 X 6) + (4 X 3)

T(4) = (4 X 5) + (5 X 4)


Dichotomy in loci:

01210
12321
23432
34543
45654

+

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
l = number of loci
n = number in loci

0123456789 .. ten loci. 0-9 to 1-10

0(1 X 1) = n
1 X 1 = l

Zero is.
Otherwise we'd have no zero.

1 = (1 X 1)
0 = 0(1 X 1)

Primary l does not number:

01 001 000
02 004 004
03 009 018
04 016 048
05 025 100

06 036 180
07 049 294
08 064 448
09 081 648
10 100 900

100 = 19 + 17 +15 + 13 +11 + 09 + 07 + 05 + 03 + 01
5 X 2 = 10
T(2) = (19 + 1) = (17 + 3) = (15 + 5) = (13 + 7) = (11 + 9)
U-turn = 11 + 9
100 - 81 = 19 etc.
> 3 = 4 - 1
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
The illusion of the number increasing from the medial point (m)

09 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90

9 + 9 = 18
18 + 18 = 36
27 + 27 = 54
36 + 36 = 72
45 + 45 = 90

m = 90

54 + 54 = 18 + m
63 + 63 = 36 + m
72 + 72 = 54 + m
81 + 81 = 72 + m
90 + 90 = m + m

54 + 54 = 108
63 + 63 = 126

126 + m = 108 + 108
A metathesis.
 
Top