## User Tag List

1. Originally Posted by ThatsWhatHeSaid
What? How? And how does the math actually relate at all? And what happening with these matrices anyway?
From where I stand, the matrices are in-and-of themselves. Like a map, the Math proves it. You can go forward and backward. It becomes a framework. You can then merge other things into this framework like was done with functions in a previous post. Now lets take an 8x8 matrix. what can we do with it? Well we have 8 functions. We can create an 8x8 matrix with these functions and if we assign each function a number and place each in a place that corresponds to the number matrix then we have just merged the frameworks. Now what can we deduce, what can we prove. How well does it actually fit within this framework when we apply permeatations that works when we deal withi numbers? What if we rearrange Ti to be 5 instead of 2, then to get it all to work we must shift everything else as well. Why, because we have placed it within this framework and thats how this framewok works, wildcat already proved it.

2. Originally Posted by poki
From where I stand, the matrices are in-and-of themselves. Like a map, the Math proves it. You can go forward and backward. It becomes a framework. You can then merge other things into this framework like was done with functions in a previous post. Now lets take an 8x8 matrix. what can we do with it? Well we have 8 functions. We can create an 8x8 matrix with these functions and if we assign each function a number and place each in a place that corresponds to the number matrix then we have just merged the frameworks. Now what can we deduce, what can we prove. How well does it actually fit within this framework when we apply permeatations that works when we deal withi numbers? What if we rearrange Ti to be 5 instead of 2, then to get it all to work we must shift everything else as well. Why, because we have placed it within this framework and thats how this framewok works, wildcat already proved it.
wat

3. It's not a proof; it's a poem.

4. Originally Posted by Morgan Le Fay
It's not a proof; it's a poem.
whats the poem?

edit: if it was a dream I could understand

5. God I wish Ti was one of my main functions; this stuff looks like Chinese to me. I'm sure this is useful in some way, but I don't have the time or patience to find the key to this apparent treasure box. Mathematicians astound me.

6. Originally Posted by poki
whats the poem?
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal.

7. Originally Posted by Morgan Le Fay
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal.
ok, fine...I will reword it "subjective proof" INTPs

8. Originally Posted by Morgan Le Fay
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal.
Thanks Morgan Le Fay. A good post.
And a strikingly accurate observation: There is not a definite shape.

01234
12345
23456
34567
45678

We cut the vertical/horizontal m at both ends:
(23456)

The original line is
horizontally 012345678
and vertically

0
1
2
3
5
5
6
7
8

including + vertical

0
12
234
3456
45678
5678
678
78
8

_ _ _ _ 0
_ _ _ 0 1 2
_ _ 0 1 2 3 4
_ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
_ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
_ _ 4 5 6 7 8
_ _ _ 6 7 8
_ _ _ _ 8

The turn rounds not only vertically and horizontally.
There is the counter and the anticounter.
Again we shift.
We inward the outward, and we outward the inward.
Russian dolls.

It is as you say.

9. How does the math relate at all?
A good question.

0
1
2
3
45678

4 - 4 = 0
5 - 3 = 2
6 - 2 = 4
7 - 1 = 6
8 - 0 = 8

we have

0
12
234
3456
45678

+

4
2
0

-

0
2
4

we have

01234
1234
234
34
4

25 = 1 + 3 + 5 +7 + 9

we have

0 X T(1) = 0

check

1 X 9
2 X 8
3 X 7
4 X 6
5 X 5

25
24
21
16
09
00

1 = 25 - 24
3 = 24 - 21
5 = 21 - 16
7 = 16 - 09
9 = 09 - 00

we had the dichotomy of T(1)

13579
97531

we have the dichotomy of 11

10. T in the loci

2 + 4 = 6
24 + (T)24 = 66
66 = (T)66

24 = 4 X 6 = 3 X 8 = 8 + 12 + 4

in loci

232
343
232

= 24

nine loci

24 + 9 = 42 - 9 = 66/2

232
343
232

we have

2 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2
3 + 2
4 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2

454
565
454 =

(T)24 in the loci

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•