Why is it that the most sensible posts on this thread are ignored?
The OP does a great job alienating serious inquiry. So, right off the bat, it's tempting to respond with equally vapid nonsense.
Originally Posted by Lex Talionis
My question is straightforward and should only be answered within the confines of the aforementioned specifications. Also, I am not concerned by any real or perceived "flaws" and/or limitations within MBTI itself, and am only asking your opinion in accord with the Myers-Briggs typology system.
No, I got that. Ming has made it pretty obvious that he's homosexual.
Just seems like a sucker punch to cultivate a comparison between something as intimate as sexual preference with something as cheap as an online spitting match.
I get that too..
My point is more that Ming made a post that was not directed at anyone in particular and Lex did. Therefore Ming was being general, non personally offensive and it could argued he making a joke.
I find his post no more offensive than a thread that says NF's are not funny, SP are all horny or SJ's are all boring. I might not agree, but no one person is being singled out and to some extent typing people is about stereotyping by the very nature of the word "type".
Lex actually proved Ming's other post correct.. the one that talks about INTJs lesser qualities.