• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Terrible generalization about authors (S/N)?

alcea rosea

New member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
3,658
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
7w6
Just wondering...

In many type descriptions it is said that people with S-function prefer fact based literature and people with N-function prefer fiction. If this is true then according to the "theory" S-people would write fact based literature and N-people fiction.

Any thoughts?
 

Splittet

Wannabe genius
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
632
MBTI Type
INTJ
Nah, I think many Ss both write and read fiction, although few Ss probably write fantasy or science-fiction. Enough Ss read though, but mainly quite mainstream fantasy and science-fiction, like Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings. I would rather say Ss tend to read down to earth fiction.
 

The_Liquid_Laser

Glowy Goopy Goodness
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
3,376
MBTI Type
ENTP
I have some S friends that read fantasy by the truckload. I think N's tend to like a wider variety of genres, while S's latch onto a few they like and stick with those. That's all I can really say about the S/N divide and reading.
 

Randomnity

insert random title here
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
9,485
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
6w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I much prefer fantasy>scifi>regular fiction>non-fiction as far as entertainment goes, but I read a lot of non-fiction books (almost always science, usually biology) for fun. Non-fiction doesn't make me feel guilty for wasting time reading trash.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,238
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
That distinction is far too simplistic.

For example, if I had to guess, I would say that Robert Jordan (who has written a fantasy series long and large enough to choke a yak suffering giganticism) is an S of some sort. Other S types would be Tom Clancy and John Grisham.

But you get Alice Sebold ("The Lovely Bones") who is pretty clearly an INFJ (based on style and her rape bio called "Lucky") who is writing "realistic fiction" with a bit of fantastic element in it. And Stephen King (ENTP), who writes horror and yet has a very good ear for the "real" and anchors his imagination in it, versus a pure fantasist like Terry "Shannara" Brooks or Neil Gaiman.

What you need to look at is how the topic matter is treated, along with total type. S's can write fantasy, but they tend to do it differently than the stereotypical N might; and vice versa.

(For example, I notice than INFJ writers -- despite being N -- usually focus a lot on "realism" in their stories. Their stories are firmly anchored in concrete detail, along with the ramifications of those details.)
 

Gabe

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
590
MBTI Type
ENTP
yea, la-de da to that one. I read more non-fiction than fiction.
 

DaRick

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
100
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
I read more non-fiction than fiction.

Yeah, so do I. Apparently, the difference is that N's prefer analogies and figurative language to literal language and 'straight-talking'. I personally think that analogies can enhance literary mediums, if used in moderation, but I prefer writers to communicate their point clearly. Otherwise, it means that 1) they don't have one, 2) they may be intentionally trying to mislead you, or 3) they're covering for a lack of depth by cramming their book with contrived analogies.

The other N's I observe (stronger N's than I, actually) tend to enjoy fantasy more than I do, although I don't mind science-fiction.
 

Jae Rae

Free-Rangin' Librarian
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
979
MBTI Type
INFJ
I read almost exclusively nonfiction, but I like literary biographies and autobiographies. MY ENTP best friend is the same, although he likes Sci Fi. My INTP husband reads Jane Austen, but mostly nonfiction.

I read Catcher in the Rye about five years ago (recommended by the ENTP), and adored it.

Jae Rae
 

quietgirl

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
401
MBTI Type
INFJ
I write a lot, and like Jennifer said, my stories normally have a bit of realism to them. However, I'm usually anchored around a certain feeling or situation & the characters are growing or improving throughout the story.

Very similiar to Alice Sebold, actually - Jennifer, thanks for bringing light to her as a possible INFJ. I knew I related well to her style of writing & I couldn't pinpoint why. In both of her novels, the characters are put at a disadvantage and then rising above it & growing from the experience.

I've written stories where a character was from a unfortunate family situation, drug addiction, etc. The story would focus on what that individual character is feeling and doing to improve their situation.

As for reading, I tend to read all sorts of books. I can certainly handle the abstract, some sci fi, and I do love fiction. However, I tend to like travel literature (I think because I travel often & everytime I read about someone's travels, I get motivated to put more money into my savings account for my next big trip!) and I also like non fiction IF it is focused on human struggle and perseverance. Stories about accomplishing goals tend to motivate me as well.

This all probably ties in with the stereotype that the INFJ is the "self help" type. I certainly see that in my reading & writing.
 
Top