Well, Atheism, Environmentalism and the Flying Spaghetti Monster have so who knows.
89% Extroverted ~ 68% Intuition ~ 84% Feeling ~ 89% Perceiving
Enneagram: 2w1 SO/SP Socionics: ENFp
Se 30.4% Si 19.1% - Ne 38.4% Ni 26.4% - Te 23.1% Ti 20% - Fe 46.4% Fi 35.8%
Sanguine | Phlegmatic
Right Brain Dominant
It's bad to be absolutist about pretty much anything in my opinion. Yeah, MBTI is really interesting but it's far from flawless. In that sense it's like most of the field of psychology. Really interesting and often helpful but far from the reliability and certainty of the older numerical-data-based sciences (e.g. physics).
So yeah, use it as a tool and try to make connections and fill in gaps yourself when the theory falls short. The potential "pitfalls" of using MBTI as a code of life are near endless and seem pretty self evident to me. So that's just real neato I guess.
btw, we're going to install an offering every Monday on this site.
You don't have to give anything... but sadly the Great and Powerful Haight won't bless you if you don't.
(Remember: It's better to give than receive, and Haight loveth a cheerful giver!)
Originally Posted by MagnifaSnail
It's bad to be absolutist about pretty much anything in my opinion.
On a serious note, yes... that.
"Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"
“Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft
if so what are the possible pitfalls people may occur up on?
To take it too seriously. It can work well as a loose guide. You are basically grouping people who are similar so you can study certain human traits, or know what area they will be most comfortable in. The biggest trap is to assume two people of the same type are any more than similar. The best way to put it into perspective is that there are probably 100 million other INFJs on Earth. Either you are the same as 100 million other people and I am the same as a tenth of the world's population, or we are just statistically similar in some areas. It is easy to choose the second one because that is basically what the test does. It takes a set of traits (that are not a complete description of human behaviours) and it looks which people possess similar ones. People within a certain range are given the same letters and referred to as the same type.
So the biggest hang up would be to believe what you can apply to person A of type X can be applied to person B of type X. Even if it applies to 90% of type X you can still only guess there's a good chance the person has the trait. Some people don't work well with probabilities and need things to apply or not apply, they get themselves in trouble. With most posts on here it is assumed that we are describing the more common attributes of a type, not all of its members.
The other problem is defining functions in terms of actions, when cognitive psychology is about information processing styles. eg. saying Xi is mean to people and eats cheese on Tuesdays is meaningless. They are predisposed to doing things a certain way because of how they see the situation and their approach. Some actions can be seen regularly in a type when the underlying process corners them into acting a certain way, some can never be consistent across a type and are just a matter of interest and personal choice.
Freude, schöner Götterfunken Tochter aus Elysium, Wir betreten feuertrunken, Himmlische, dein Heiligtum! Deine Zauber binden wieder Was die Mode streng geteilt; Alle Menschen werden Brüder, Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.
Is it that by its indefiniteness it shadows forth the heartless voids and immensities of the universe, and thus stabs us from behind with the thought of annihilation, when beholding the white depths of the milky way?