I beg to differ. Discussing cognitive functions and trying to figure out what they really mean is nothing but semantics. Since I have never scraped a Fi off my hood, I strongly assume that it is just an abstract concept that gains its validity only via definition and discussion thereof. Nothing but semantics. The same applies to the other words I've underlined.
Sorry if that seems pedantic, but to me it somehow seems to me you're trying to take the easy way out here.
(I'm not trying to rant here, I'd just like to have a clarification.)