User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Not fitting your type description because of...

  1. #1
    my user title is too shor Array polikujm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Not fitting your type description because of...

    Over-emphasized dichtomies. That's right. However, most particularly introversion. That's also correct, introversion. Out of all the 8 preferences, why introversion?
    Well, types are based on functions as well. But say I am atypical, and an introvert. I am an INTJ. Okay, I'm an INTJ. Like I said, atypical. Is this even possible, I ask of you people? Can anyone relate? Hypothetically, and let us not get carried away here, an INTJ has extremely underdeveloped extroverted functions. That would make his Te function, so to say, near invisible. What kind of person is that in real life, what does he do? What description will ever fit him if he can not come into the light so we can see how he acts on the spot, and how he fits "externally" into the world? And how will we know if he's a true INTJ if he does not fit the description? He's not worried about fitting in, he wants to know what's wrong with the theory.

    One believes himself to be INTJ because he relates strongly with Ni description and secondly to Fi description. Ni almost acts as logic to him too. So function theory says, probably INTJ. Function tests say one is an odd case, probably INTJ. Dichotomy test says INXP. Well, sure. If one has a weak extroverted J function, than is it likely that the P/J axis will normalize? Funny I should use the word normalize to describe this person.

    One tidbit of information. This profile fits the best, but mainly the neutral non-J parts:

    I intuit that a good number of people online relate to me in this sense. They test as P, but are by little means Pe.

  2. #2
    Filthy Apes! Array Kalach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008


    ^That whole post is Te.

    (With a liberal helping of Ni expressionism and Fi motive. Welcome aboard the good ship NTJ.)
    Bellison uncorked a flood of horrible profanity, which, translated, meant, "This is extremely unusual."

    Boy meets Grr

Similar Threads

  1. [SP] SP, How Are You NOT Like Your Type Description?
    By SquirrelTao in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 10-09-2016, 12:30 PM
  2. [SJ] SJ, How Are You NOT Like Your Type Description?
    By SquirrelTao in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-03-2016, 04:45 PM
  3. [MBTItm] NF, How Are You NOT Like Your Type Description?
    By SquirrelTao in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 01-22-2016, 09:17 PM
  4. Best Type Description Ever?
    By Savage Idealist in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 08:40 AM
  5. [NT] NT, How Are You NOT Like Your Type Description?
    By SquirrelTao in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 09-27-2008, 05:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts