All IxFx girls enjoy being submissive in relationships?

[dynamiteninja]

Just a trend I've noticed among the ones I know. Is my guess right?

 

[Engler]

Yes, and all ITs are socially inept, all EFs are blinded by emotion, and all EPs suffer from ADHD.

 

[poppy]

Ahahaaha.

Yeah, sorry mate, I don't see this conversation going anywhere good.

 

[dynamiteninja]

Yes, and all ITs are socially inept, all EFs are blinded by emotion, and all EPs suffer from ADHD.

This is true though isn't it?

 

[LEVINA]

At one point, I considered making a post saying that I feel sorry for INFJ girls since it seems like they are being stalked out more by men (for "Relationships" than any other type.

 

[dynamiteninja]

At one point, I considered making a post saying that I feel sorry for INFJ girls since it seems like they are being stalked out more by men (for "Relationships" than any other type.

I don't get it.

 

[Engler]

This is true though isn't it?

Of course it is. Typology theory can seamlessly be applied to reality, so that virtually all human behavior can be predicted.

Speaking of which, you must be quite late for your poetry reading. Don't forget to wear copious amounts of mascara, and you might as well cut your wrists a few times before leaving (you know, for good measure).

 

[Lauren Ashley]

I prefer equality in relationships. Actually, I'll have it no other way.

 

[Thursday]

I prefer equality in relationships. Actually, I'll have it no other way.

we finally agree.

 

[Oaky]

I prefer to be the dominant in a relationship. Actually, I'll have it no other way.

 

[Lauren Ashley]

we finally agree.

We do? Then I take that back.

Wait, you're not female. So your preference on this matter does not count.

I prefer to be the dominant in a relationship. Actually, I'll have it no other way.

Makes sense.

 

[dynamiteninja]

Of course it is. Typology theory can seamlessly be applied to reality, so that virtually all human behavior can be predicted.

Speaking of which, you must be quite late for your poetry reading. Don't forget to wear copious amounts of mascara, and you might as well cut your wrists a few times before leaving (you know, for good measure).

It's the ISFPs who cut themselves most I think. They're the emos.

 

[dynamiteninja]

Surely there is a dominant and a submissive even by the slightest amount in every relationship?

 

[Coeur]

I enjoy /letting/ my partner be dominant, but I hate being forced to be submissive.

If that makes any sense. o.0

 

[LEVINA]

It's the ISFPs who cut themselves most I think. They're the emos.

You both are getting it wrong. INFPs are emo because they're emo. ISFPs are emo because "itz cooolllll man"

 

[Coeur]

Surely there is a dominant and a submissive even by the slightest amount in every relationship?

I don't think that anybody would enjoy being either extreme all the time.

 

[dynamiteninja]

I don't think that anybody would enjoy being either extreme all the time.

Of course not. Not really what I was getting at.

 

[Lauren Ashley]

Surely there is a dominant and a submissive even by the slightest amount in every relationship?

There doesn't have to be. Why do you believe so?

 

[Lexicon]

I'd have to say I prefer a sense of equality in a relationship, however due to my accomodating nature, some may conclude they've assumed a more overtly dominant role in our relationship. This is all loosely based on appearances, y'know, not the internal dynamic. When you get to the core of it all, though, I'm a rather stubborn person in my relationships, who'll do as I see fit, when I feel it appropriate to do so, and no sooner. Displays of dominant, pressuring behaviors only serve to further solidify my stance.

 

[Gewitter27]

Although I'm not an IF or a girl, I find that relationships should not be dominant and submissive or the other way around, but an equal ground.