• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

I STILL don't understand MBTI.

SillySapienne

`~~Philosoflying~~`
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
9,801
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
4w5
Regarding the cult-ish comment.

When people seem hellbent on stuffing everyone they know into one of the 16 archetypes, I think they are maintaining irrationally staunch beliefs towards this particular system.

This is incredibly far from being a hard science.

It is fluid and fun.

I don't think it should be taken too seriously.

:)
 

poppy

triple nerd score
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
2,215
MBTI Type
intj
Enneagram
5
I think your perspective on it is built on the idea that "stuffing people into 1 of 16 archetypes" is a confining thing that limits the expression of the individual. I think the opposite is true, the more people we add to the types, the more variety and dimension their definitions gain, the system improves and it's utility increases (and this utility is to allow us to better understand ourselves and others, which facilitates individuality).

I think the point when it becomes confining is when people take the stereotypes (all x must do y, if you do z then you are not type x) seriously. It is possible to take the system seriously (and indeed if one does, one should recognize that it can be improved, as all systems can) without belittling the importance of the individual.
 

SillySapienne

`~~Philosoflying~~`
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
9,801
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
4w5
I think your perspective on it is built on the idea that "stuffing people into 1 of 16 archetypes" is a confining thing that limits the expression of the individual. I think the opposite is true, the more people we add to the types, the more variety and dimension their definitions gain, the system improves and it's utility increases (and this utility is to allow us to better understand ourselves and others, which facilitates individuality).

I think the point when it becomes confining is when people take the stereotypes (all x must do y, if you do z then you are not type x) seriously. It is possible to take the system seriously (and indeed if one does, one should recognize that it can be improved, as all systems can) without belittling the importance of the individual.
Interesting, still, only 16 archetypes for billions of highly intricate, and unique biological systems each within themselves, i.e. human beings to reflect/categorize as, seems far too narrow to me.
 

poppy

triple nerd score
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
2,215
MBTI Type
intj
Enneagram
5
Interesting, still, only 16 archetypes for billions of highly intricate, and unique biological systems each within themselves, i.e. human beings to reflect/categorize as, seems far too narrow to me.

Fair enough, I could see how, conceptually, it would look quite daunting. But as humans we throw people into categories all the time. Think of male vs female... We throw everyone we see into one of those two categories every day (don't tell me you don't recognize gender ;)), but I suppose it "feels" different to do so because it's based on an objective standard (though these labels, too, carry stereotypes and effect how we treat the people we apply them to).

Anyway I'm just musing.
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
It's for people who have no natural insight into other human beings.
It's also for people who don't know what to do with toilet paper.

:newwink:

Are you talking about the ones who insist on folding triangles and stuff and then get mad when the triangle dissappears from the end?

I can apply it pretty good I think, but I also think people have the theory confused so :harhar:
 

Jaguar

Active member
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
20,647
Are you talking about the ones who insist on folding triangles and stuff and then get mad when the triangle dissappears from the end?

I can apply it pretty good I think, but I also think people have the theory confused so :harhar:


A shrink would find those anal-rententive triangle folders, "interesting." haha.
I'm not someone eager to apply seriously flawed theories to anyone, or anything.

Hey, glad to see you chose an avatar. :newwink:
 

Kalach

Filthy Apes!
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
4,310
MBTI Type
INTJ
Regarding the cult-ish comment.

When people seem hellbent on stuffing everyone they know into one of the 16 archetypes, I think they are maintaining irrationally staunch beliefs towards this particular system.

This is incredibly far from being a hard science.

It is fluid and fun.

I don't think it should be taken too seriously.

:)

And you're not bothered that that's an archetypal ENFP thing to say?
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
A shrink would find those anal-rententive triangle folders, "interesting." haha.
I'm not someone eager to apply seriously flawed theories to anyone, or anything.

Hey, glad to see you chose an avatar. :newwink:

If you can find the flaws its not really to bad. It is challenging because things dont always line up as expected, nor do people type correctly or type others correctly. I try to find a consistency within types. Nothing is ever set in stone for me.
 

Eilonwy

Vulnerability
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
7,051
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Athenian200, I don't know if this is relevant to what you're asking...I picture temperament typing as a Bell Curve (as opposed to boxes). I think extreme preferences (at the ends of the curve) are pretty obvious, but a lot of people are going to be somewhere in the middle and hard to pin down. To me it's mostly just a tool to give me insight into my own behaviors.
 
Top