User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 21 to 30 of 33

  1. #21
    ⒺⓉⒷ Eric B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    548 sp/sx
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    OK, thanks.
    The link is the first one, above. I'll update that page when I get the chance.
    APS Profile: Inclusion: e/w=1/6 (Supine) |Control: e/w=7/3 (Choleric) |Affection: e/w=1/9 (Supine)
    Ti 54.3 | Ne 47.3 | Si 37.8 | Fe 17.7 | Te 22.5 | Ni 13.4 | Se 18.9 | Fi 27.9

    Temperament (APS) from scratch -- MBTI Type from scratch
    Type Ideas

  2. #22
    your resident asshole
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greed View Post
    Opened it up and re-saved it.. said some features were incompatible with Word 97/2003 but it seems to be just fine. This may or may not work..

    Haven't had a chance to look over it in detail yet, but it looks interesting.
    Thanks. I've yet to try this, though, because I installed a new version of Windows on my computer.

  3. #23
    Te > Fi > Ni Shaula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    608

    Default

    I understand the idea. But I think I'm an idiot because I don't understand how to interpret these charts.
    Is not to be held accuntable for peeling errors.

  4. #24
    Senior Member jackandthebeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    MBTI
    IXFX
    Enneagram
    tert
    Socionics
    iary
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Umm, Eric B, I don't know if this some straight-in-the-face thing that I should understand, but I can't see the link. How do I click on it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaula View Post
    I understand the idea. But I think I'm an idiot because I don't understand how to interpret these charts.
    No, it's probably me. I think I underestimated the need for an explanation.
    It's the same as the 1-8 for the basic 16 patterns. only the thing is, since you have more first functions, (and 2nd or third, whatever) as you're combining patterns, you have to have other functions in lower places to compensate. So you're not going to get functions in eight different places, although generally there are still four functions on each side. With the rationale that the natural capacities of the patterns (if not individuals) are equivalent, I took the number 36, which was the total if you add up 1-8 for the main functions, and applied it as the total for the other 60 types. I was also working with the idea of balance between the functions themselves (for example, if there are 2 ones and 2 twos, there also have to be 2 sevens and 2 eights). I was able to apply this later by making sure that working outside-in, there were either 4 sets of functions that added up to nine, or two that added up to nine and one that added up to eighteen in the middle, so it's all balanced out in that way as well as by the general number.
    Again, how I figured out the patterns was by combining existing patterns. I put the patterns of the types I was combining into rows, using what seems to be the standard E before I, S before N, T before F, and J before P, and then crossing out repetitions of each function. Initially I had it wrong- I used the functions in the order that they first appeared, but at some point I realized that Te and Se seemed more likely to come before Si and Ti in my pattern, and I looked at a few other peoples' patterns as well which made more sense the second way. Oh yeah, the second way was to either take the first four functions and then the last four and cross out the ones in the middle (or the first five with the last two between primary and shadow). That's the way I currently have the patterns, and i'm convinced of it because it also has a similar structure to the basic 16. It keeps the E I reversal from primary to shadow which the other method doesn't, and it keeps the order of functions' opposites (by this I mean, if you have Ni first, you're going to have Se before Si). You might want to try combining the patterns yourself- it might make better sense if you actually try it.
    The thing with the 7 nonexistent patterns I explained just a few posts ago.
    I hope this makes a little more sense now. Again, I used Wikisocion's function descriptions as a frame of reference (they list what functions do in each place), although you have to use your judgment on it, since they'll make statements assuming if Ni is in seventh place then it's after Ne or Se when that might not be the case for a particular subtype. but I think it's generally pretty useful information as a frame of reference for understanding a particular type. (you just type the function abbreviations into the search box).
    Let me know if there's anything else about the charts that you don't understand.

  5. #25
    Senior Member jackandthebeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    MBTI
    IXFX
    Enneagram
    tert
    Socionics
    iary
    Posts
    115

    Default

    Shaula, I just went back up and saw your avatar, and it reminded me of the old prisoner guy in Disney's 'Hunchback of Notre Dame," which I found amusing.

  6. #26
    ⒺⓉⒷ Eric B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    548 sp/sx
    Socionics
    INTj
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jackandthebeast View Post
    Umm, Eric B, I don't know if this some straight-in-the-face thing that I should understand, but I can't see the link. How do I click on it?
    It was at the beginning of the first post I made in this thread (were you looking in the more recent post?)

    Here it is again, and now I have added it all, with anchors that link directly to it: Temperament Part 3: The Thought Box
    APS Profile: Inclusion: e/w=1/6 (Supine) |Control: e/w=7/3 (Choleric) |Affection: e/w=1/9 (Supine)
    Ti 54.3 | Ne 47.3 | Si 37.8 | Fe 17.7 | Te 22.5 | Ni 13.4 | Se 18.9 | Fi 27.9

    Temperament (APS) from scratch -- MBTI Type from scratch
    Type Ideas

  7. #27
    Senior Member iamathousandapples's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Enneagram
    5w6
    Socionics
    ILI
    Posts
    495

    Default

    The IxTP one looks messed up. I'm pretty sure Fe would be last and not Fi.

  8. #28
    Senior Member NewEra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    I
    Posts
    3,104

    Default

    I think this makes a little sense. When I do the MBTI type tests, I get ISTJ half the time and ISTP half the time. Then again when I do cognitive tests, I normally get some mixed up function order like...
    Si > Ti > Te > Se > Ni > Fi > Ne > Fe

    That's the average order function for me. I don't strictly identify with either the ISTJ or ISTP types totally. I probably would identify more with the ISTx type.

  9. #29
    Senior Member professor goodstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7~7
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iamathousandapples View Post
    The IxTP one looks messed up. I'm pretty sure Fe would be last and not Fi.
    imo, i'm Very sure Fi would be before Fe due to P alone. The aspects of typology do have areas that aren't so much theoretical. i would say cognitive function descriptions are accurate as an individual preference, even if it's by 51% one over the other. They are also very accurate in there description alone. I really don't see any overlap. Yet, i can see where they could be misinterpreted, even by myself Next in line, i can see Fe, Te, Ni and Si being the decision maker or info gatherer in J. Where it gets anal/clinical is when typology forces specific function orders to make one of a possible 16. I do like where this thread and other innovations are going though Who sais this theory can't evolve by attempting a possible 76. Even when there are flaws here and there. Fe before Fi in IxTP.....psh , doubt it.
    everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?

  10. #30
    Senior Member iamathousandapples's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Enneagram
    5w6
    Socionics
    ILI
    Posts
    495

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by professor goodstain View Post
    imo, i'm Very sure Fi would be before Fe due to P alone. The aspects of typology do have areas that aren't so much theoretical. i would say cognitive function descriptions are accurate as an individual preference, even if it's by 51% one over the other. They are also very accurate in there description alone. I really don't see any overlap. Yet, i can see where they could be misinterpreted, even by myself Next in line, i can see Fe, Te, Ni and Si being the decision maker or info gatherer in J. Where it gets anal/clinical is when typology forces specific function orders to make one of a possible 16. I do like where this thread and other innovations are going though Who sais this theory can't evolve by attempting a possible 76. Even when there are flaws here and there. Fe before Fi in IxTP.....psh , doubt it.
    but both INTPs and ISTPs are Fe Aux

Similar Threads

  1. [MBTItm] Typology Central Members Personality Type Survey
    By Nonpareil in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 570
    Last Post: 11-11-2017, 09:46 PM
  2. Personality Types and Music
    By SuperServal in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 06:37 PM
  3. [INFP] INFP personality type descritpion
    By SolitaryWalker in forum Myers-Briggs Type Profiles
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-22-2012, 09:06 PM
  4. Personality Type and Growth
    By heart in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 05:31 PM
  5. Personality Types Under Stress
    By digesthisickness in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-10-2007, 09:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO