User Tag List

First 394748495051 Last

Results 481 to 490 of 511

  1. #481
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,444

    Default

    You want to know a type, which presupposes function order, so you can do what--
    presume X,Y, and Z and stereotype my ass?
    No thanks.

  2. #482
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    You want to know a type, which presupposes function order, so you can do what--
    presume X,Y, and Z and stereotype my ass?
    No thanks.
    you'll get stereotyped whether you have a type or not. a type may be one way to stereotype a person, but your actions will stereotype you no matter what you do... even if you do nothing. and right now, you're pretty much in the "pretentious" box because you think you can be someone else by not having a type.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  3. #483
    Order Now! pure_mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    MBTI
    ESFJ
    Posts
    6,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into It View Post
    2.Republicans, Democrats, it's getting hard to tell the difference. But not many SJ's would criticize the system as a whole.
    Maybe you should let the SJ's speak for ourselves? I happen to detest political parties, just as George Washington did. I am also aghast at about 80-90% of what the federal government does in this day and age.
    Who wants to try a bottle of merc's "Extroversion Olive Oil?"

  4. #484
    Senior Member Into It's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Posts
    664

    Default

    repost
    An inscription above the gate to Hell:
    "Eternal Love also created me"

  5. #485
    Senior Member Into It's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    You want to know a type, which presupposes function order, so you can do what--
    presume X,Y, and Z and stereotype my ass?
    Well, yes, to a degree...
    But I wouldn't look at it in such a negative light, I don't stereotype people as a point of judgement- only to analyze what may or may not be accurate about the theories, and I never hold people up to the theories- it is they who must conform to reality and not the other way around.
    An inscription above the gate to Hell:
    "Eternal Love also created me"

  6. #486
    Senior Member Into It's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pure_mercury View Post
    Maybe you should let the SJ's speak for ourselves? I happen to detest political parties, just as George Washington did. I am also aghast at about 80-90% of what the federal government does in this day and age.
    I respect this, (and like your avatar), but I stand by what I said, the SJ's would certainly be the last to detest the system as a whole. This may or may not be a bad thing, I guess that depends on what you believe. But I think it is true nonetheless. You must be grouped with other SJ's within this theory, but you may be a more progressive thinker than most of them. That you are on this website may speak to this. I don't make presuppositions about individuals.

    And don't take my other SJ comments too seriously.
    An inscription above the gate to Hell:
    "Eternal Love also created me"

  7. #487
    Order Now! pure_mercury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    MBTI
    ESFJ
    Posts
    6,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into It View Post
    I respect this, (and like your avatar), but I stand by what I said, the SJ's would certainly be the last to detest the system as a whole. This may or may not be a bad thing, I guess that depends on what you believe. But I think it is true nonetheless. You must be grouped with other SJ's within this theory, but you may be a more progressive thinker than most of them. That you are on this website may speak to this. I don't make presuppositions about individuals.

    And don't take my other SJ comments too seriously.
    I think that SJ's would be the FIRST to have a problem with a system that they felt was personally unfair or a deterioration of how things are supposed to be (like my agreement with Washington on our political system).
    Who wants to try a bottle of merc's "Extroversion Olive Oil?"

  8. #488
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    you're pretty much in the "pretentious" box because you think you can be someone else by not having a type.
    That sounds like something a dogmatic--and ignorant-- prick would say.
    You obviously have a closed mind, unable to imagine a possibility,
    that hasn't been allowed by MBTI theory.
    That makes you a sheep.
    Sheep don't lead, they follow.

    In order to accept MBTI theory one must actually believe,
    each type has a predetermined function order.
    I am not the only person on this board who thinks that's bullshit.

  9. #489
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    That sounds like something a dogmatic--and ignorant-- prick would say.
    You obviously have a closed mind, unable to imagine a possibility,
    that hasn't been allowed by MBTI theory.
    That makes you a sheep.
    Sheep don't lead, they follow.

    In order to accept MBTI theory one must actually believe,
    each type has a predetermined function order.
    I am not the only person on this board who thinks that's bullshit.
    you live on fallacies apparently. while i may be a prick, i'm neither dogmatic nor ignorant. i don't reject the idea of MBTI types, but i know it's not perfect either. the difference between you and i is that i can adapt and say that my type is closer to one type than other. you prefer not adapting, and you think that makes you better?

    you're no better until you can prove it, and as someone who cries sheep and voices judgment instead of reason, you're pretty far behind. maybe you should see your own fallacies instead of trying to jab at others for what they believe.

    also, with your crude display of action here, i can guarantee you i can lead better than you.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  10. #490
    Senior Member Into It's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    That sounds like something a dogmatic--and ignorant-- prick would say.
    You obviously have a closed mind, unable to imagine a possibility,
    that hasn't been allowed by MBTI theory.
    1That makes you a sheep.
    Sheep don't lead, they follow.

    2In order to accept MBTI theory one must actually believe,
    each type has a predetermined function order.

    I am not the only person on this board who thinks that's bullshit.
    1.That logic is totally unsound; you probably knew that, but it's okay because you were speaking out of hurt.

    2. Actually this is not true, MBTI theory has absolutely nothing to do with predetermined functions. Jung came in and added all that stuff later, so you can accept the theory without the functions.

    3. By the way, you're an ENFP. I just saved you ten minutes of test taking. You aren't ashamed of having something in common with me, are you? ENFP's are cool, what's the problem?
    An inscription above the gate to Hell:
    "Eternal Love also created me"

Similar Threads

  1. TypeC biased against sensors?
    By Oaky in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 03-28-2010, 12:52 AM
  2. [NT] The NT Prejudice Against Feeling
    By Synarch in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 03:42 AM
  3. [MBTItm] Question for sensors?
    By SolitaryWalker in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 116
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 03:30 AM
  4. [ISTJ] Famous dead Sensors
    By labyrinthine in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 01:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO