User Tag List

First 45678 Last

Results 51 to 60 of 75

  1. #51
    DoubleplusUngoodNonperson
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    MBTI
    Hype
    Posts
    2,078

    Default

    I'm 100% motivated to type this message!

  2. #52
    Senior Member King sns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    6w7 sp/sx
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    I'm 100% extroverted according to one of the tests.
    That's why i'm sitting here behind the computer screen and talking about it

  3. #53
    Wild Card Atomic Fiend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    ESTP
    Enneagram
    873 sx/so
    Socionics
    SLE Ti
    Posts
    7,161

    Default

    Se-Fe-Te-Ne?

  4. #54
    Senior Member King sns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    6w7 sp/sx
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silently Honest View Post
    Se-Fe-Te-Ne?
    lol, no. that would be insane.
    I must have been hyper that day or something.

    (I guess you could say 100% hyper.)

  5. #55
    veteran attention whore Jeffster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    ESFP
    Enneagram
    7w6 sx
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    6,727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajah View Post
    ESFP!
    OMG UR SO CLOSE!
    Jeffster Illustrates the Artisan Temperament <---- click here

    "I like the sigs with quotes in them from other forum members." -- Oberon

    The SP Spazz Youtube Channel

  6. #56
    Senior Member Nonsensical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    4
    Posts
    4,010

    Default

    I have always veiwed Myers Briggs to revolve around human preference, and not to be a strict code of events that define a person, and that the person is always going to act a certain way under a given type.

    That being said, I think it's pretty much impossible to be 100%, no matter what the test tells you, because MBTI isn't a set of boxes where different types fit in certain boxes, it's more like a scatter plot where you're a little here, a little there. You're type only defines the actions and decisions that you are most likely to act upon and carry out on a normal routine, disregarding any environmental catalysts (say, Mental disorders).

    As for my type, If I were to guestimate my type percentage I'd have to say..

    E - 15/100 - 15%
    N - 75/100 - 75%
    F - 70/100 - 70%
    P - 45/100 - 45%

    As you can see, my E is very week, almost nearing borderline I. My N is very strong, in relative to percentages, as is my F. My P is fairly strong to average, as nothing is said to be 100%.
    Is it that by its indefiniteness it shadows forth the heartless voids and immensities of the universe, and thus stabs us from behind with the thought of annihilation, when beholding the white depths of the milky way?

  7. #57
    garbage
    Guest

    Default

    I resonate closest with the type descriptions of ENTJ, then ENTP, then ENFP, in that order. Looking at the ideal function ordering of each type and the descriptions of the functions makes sense, too, as I see how Ne and Fi come into play for me but the planning and organization combo of Te/Ni is obviously strong in me. I also sometimes test as a feeler or a perceiver (or their near-equivalents) on personality tests that I haven't taken before, but factors that would map to extraversion (e.g. "Outgoing" in the Big 5) and intuition are pretty well consistent.

    So, it's a combination of different metrics that have led me to discover my type and preference strengths, not just the tests alone. Tests are inherently flawed for reasons described, type descriptions won't always match spot-on, and function ordering tries to explain too much.

  8. #58

    Default

    I tested INFJ first time.

    [RANT]I think you have to know yourself really well, to the point of objectivity, in all the areas the test questions. I don't believe any type is purely objective in that sense, and it doesn't help that most people are taking the test to learn more about themselves. They use their MBTi type to help learn more, and at the same time learn with a huge bias in what they explore or believe as a result of it. It can highlight strengths and produce feel good moments, but tomorrow I might waking feeling like ISTJ is the way for me, and learn a sudden appreciation of thinking that way and seeing the world that way. Tell me some idiots who thought they'd choose 16 categories, rather than 25 or 10 or whatever else they could've chosen, will change that. They are arbitrary, and if someone can ever explain a scientific basis for grouping by these things, rather than it just being comfortable groupings in social terms, I might believe there is something to it. That isn't to say you can't group humans, just that this is all we are doing. Creating modules where there are no clear barriers. We group all the time, I can group black haired people, blue eyed people, there are traits to group, but why do the groups mean anything deeper than blue eye people have blue eyes and black haired people have black hair. Obviously they are genetic things, but I was highlighting them as superficial things we perceive hence group. The human brain is adaptable, that is the beauty of it. If anything MBTi has made me bored of being my type and want to explore the world as something new. Type is a limitation. And a boxing in of thinking and perspective. And you'll never learn that more than when you put an F in your type. If there is another way to see it, why not go there. Is it an excuse to be something, and not learn more? And does defining self achieve much more than comfort and restriction in what you can be?

    Why does anyone need to be anything except to keep others happy with an image? Humans are too dynamic to define, and regardless of the four letters next to names, social cliches, whatever else, everyone should be met on a personal basis, because that is the only level you will ever truly define them on. And I believe it has never been the goal of psychology to change that.[/RANT]
    Freude, schöner Götterfunken Tochter aus Elysium, Wir betreten feuertrunken, Himmlische, dein Heiligtum! Deine Zauber binden wieder Was die Mode streng geteilt; Alle Menschen werden Brüder, Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.

  9. #59
    garbage
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noigmn View Post
    Humans are too dynamic to define, and regardless of the four letters next to names, social cliches, whatever else, everyone should be met on a personal basis, because that is the only level you will ever truly define them on. And I believe it has never been the goal of psychology to change that.[/RANT]
    This was actually much of the point of Gifts Differing, which just so happens to have been written by Isabel Briggs Myers. Typing wasn't intended to be a limitation, rather as a starting point in the realm of self-discovery and an aid in understanding general differences in other people.

  10. #60
    Just a statistic rhinosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    INTP
    Posts
    1,470

    Default

    According to the way I view things, my probability of existence is 100%.

    So there, nyah.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-14-2011, 09:20 PM
  2. "Oh WAAAAAHHH, you're not an INFJ!"
    By mrcockburn in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: 09-29-2011, 12:04 PM
  3. You're not young anymore...
    By nightning in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-09-2008, 11:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO