User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

  1. #1
    Senior Member professor goodstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7~7
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,785

    Default Another possible property to ones preferences

    I know it's obvious to you all by now that i'm not so ejamacated. So i definitely missed class when they were teaching about instinct in relation to mbti. If so, disregard. Or go ahead and regard with a hint.

    Could (insinctive) and (noninstinctive) be added to the preferential elements, or is four enough as it is.
    everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?

  2. #2
    rawr Costrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    5w4
    Socionics
    LII
    Posts
    2,320

    Default

    Define instinctive and noninstinctive.
    "All humour has a foundation of truth."
    - Costrin

  3. #3
    Senior Member professor goodstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7~7
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,785

    Default

    That'll be all. Thank you. I certainly appreciated the input from all of you.
    everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?

  4. #4
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by professor goodstain View Post
    Could (insinctive) and (noninstinctive) be added to the preferential elements, or is four enough as it is.
    Whoa. This is exactly what I was thinking of a month ago. I like the idea.

  5. #5
    Senior Member professor goodstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    7~7
    Socionics
    IEE
    Posts
    1,785

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lemons View Post
    Whoa. This is exactly what I was thinking of a month ago. I like the idea.
    exactly
    everyone uses every function about evenly. take NE for example. if there are those who don't use it much, then why are there such massive amounts of people constantly flowing through Wallmart with 20 items or less?

  6. #6
    deleted
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,946

    Default

    If instinctive correlates with one of the existent functions, then it can be added to the requirements. Thus people might change types.

    Like if we got rid of P and J, S would probably include more J tendency since NJs are rarer. So the minority INTJs would find suit with IST more than INT. But those few don't now because there is P and J.

    If there is not much correlation, then consider it a decent candidate.

Similar Threads

  1. Ne dom type 7's: Have you ever had problems sticking to one career?
    By The Great One in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-26-2012, 08:04 PM
  2. Hi! Another new INFP to add to the mix!
    By Verity in forum Welcomes and Introductions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-14-2011, 07:05 PM
  3. Adapting subconsciously to one's environment
    By Ezra in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 06:18 AM
  4. The Worst Possible Ending to "Harry Potter"?
    By Totenkindly in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 07:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO