Another possible property to ones preferences

[professor goodstain]

I know it's obvious to you all by now that i'm not so ejamacated. So i definitely missed class when they were teaching about instinct in relation to mbti. If so, disregard. Or go ahead and regard with a hint.

Could (insinctive) and (noninstinctive) be added to the preferential elements, or is four enough as it is.

 

[Costrin]

Define instinctive and noninstinctive.

 

[professor goodstain]

That'll be all. Thank you. I certainly appreciated the input from all of you.

 

[527468]

Could (insinctive) and (noninstinctive) be added to the preferential elements, or is four enough as it is.

Whoa. This is exactly what I was thinking of a month ago. I like the idea.

 

[professor goodstain]

Whoa. This is exactly what I was thinking of a month ago. I like the idea.

exactly

 

[527468]

If instinctive correlates with one of the existent functions, then it can be added to the requirements. Thus people might change types.

Like if we got rid of P and J, S would probably include more J tendency since NJs are rarer. So the minority INTJs would find suit with IST more than INT. But those few don't now because there is P and J.

If there is not much correlation, then consider it a decent candidate.